PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMVF.DE vs. AUM5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMVF.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMVF.DE achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than AUM5.DE's 11.38% return.


LMVF.DE

1D
0.56%
1M
1.99%
YTD
8.83%
6M
10.68%
1Y
17.84%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*

AUM5.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.38%
6M
10.89%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
14.88%
10Y*
15.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMVF.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMVF.DE
Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist
8.83%24.80%9.34%18.84%-11.91%22.15%-0.72%27.42%-13.08%-1.52%
AUM5.DE
Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
11.38%4.80%32.39%22.64%-14.14%40.96%7.10%34.94%-1.01%-0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between LMVF.DE and AUM5.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2017

0.69

The correlation between LMVF.DE and AUM5.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMVF.DE vs. AUM5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMVF.DE
LMVF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LMVF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

AUM5.DE
AUM5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AUM5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMVF.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMVF.DEAUM5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.41

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.57

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

12.74

-6.29

LMVF.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMVF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the AUM5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMVF.DE and AUM5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMVF.DEAUM5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.20

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.97

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.96

-0.46

Drawdowns

LMVF.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, which is greater than AUM5.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMVF.DE and AUM5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMVF.DEAUM5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.51%

-33.66%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-7.15%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.28%

-23.30%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-23.30%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.46%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-4.00%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.01%

+0.79%

Volatility

LMVF.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that LMVF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUM5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMVF.DEAUM5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

2.63%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

7.61%

+4.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.60%

11.64%

+2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

15.19%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

16.07%

+1.57%

LMVF.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMVF.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AUM5.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LMVF.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Dividend Comparison

LMVF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, while AUM5.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AUM5.DE
Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMVF.DE
Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist
2.99%3.25%2.84%2.59%3.36%2.11%1.99%3.12%3.68%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMVF.DE and AUM5.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LMVF.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LMVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AUM5.DE.

LMVF.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while AUM5.DE is S&P 500. LMVF.DE tracks MSCI EMU, while AUM5.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LMVF.DE and 0.15% for AUM5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMVF.DE and AUM5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer