PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMVF.DE vs. ASWA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMVF.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) and HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc (ASWA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMVF.DE achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly higher than ASWA.DE's -10.58% return.


LMVF.DE

1D
0.56%
1M
1.99%
YTD
8.83%
6M
10.68%
1Y
17.84%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*

ASWA.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
-10.58%
6M
-9.85%
1Y
0.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMVF.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LMVF.DE
Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist
8.83%24.80%9.34%2.57%
ASWA.DE
HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc
-10.58%26.07%-11.37%-2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between LMVF.DE and ASWA.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023

0.70

The correlation between LMVF.DE and ASWA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMVF.DE vs. ASWA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMVF.DE
LMVF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LMVF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ASWA.DE
ASWA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ASWA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMVF.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) and HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc (ASWA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMVF.DEASWA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.06

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

0.01

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

0.03

+6.43

LMVF.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMVF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the ASWA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMVF.DE and ASWA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMVF.DEASWA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

0.01

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

-0.04

+0.54

Drawdowns

LMVF.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, which is greater than ASWA.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMVF.DE and ASWA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMVF.DEASWA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.51%

-30.36%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-30.36%

+20.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-23.85%

+23.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-8.15%

+2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

10.54%

-7.74%

Volatility

LMVF.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) is 4.52%, while HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc (ASWA.DE) has a volatility of 7.52%. This indicates that LMVF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASWA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMVF.DEASWA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

7.52%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

37.06%

-25.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.60%

33.68%

-19.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

24.72%

-8.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

24.72%

-7.08%

LMVF.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMVF.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ASWA.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMVF.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Dividend Comparison

LMVF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, while ASWA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASWA.DE
HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMVF.DE
Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist
2.99%3.25%2.84%2.59%3.36%2.11%1.99%3.12%3.68%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMVF.DE and ASWA.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LMVF.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LMVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASWA.DE.

LMVF.DE tracks MSCI EMU, while ASWA.DE tracks SGI European Green Deal ESG Screened. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LMVF.DE and 0.60% for ASWA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMVF.DE and ASWA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer