LMUB vs. MFLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LMUB (iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF) and MFLX (First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. LMUB is passively managed, while MFLX is actively managed. Over the past year, LMUB returned 9.37% vs 9.22% for MFLX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LMUB charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for MFLX.

Performance

LMUB vs. MFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB) and First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMUB achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than MFLX's 3.33% return.

LMUB

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 9.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFLX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.21%
• YTD: 3.33%
• 6M: 3.84%
• 1Y: 9.22%
• 3Y*: 5.48%
• 5Y*: -0.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMUB vs. MFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LMUB iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF	2.32%	3.52%
MFLX First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF	3.33%	3.12%

Correlation

The correlation between LMUB and MFLX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025	0.57

The correlation between LMUB and MFLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LMUB vs. MFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMUB

LMUB Risk / Return Rank: 68
LMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
LMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
LMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 77
LMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
LMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 60

MFLX

MFLX Risk / Return Rank: 71
MFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
MFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
MFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
MFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
MFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMUB vs. MFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB) and First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LMUB	MFLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.27	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	3.47	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.49	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	2.97	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.61	11.95	-1.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LMUB vs. MFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMUB Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the MFLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMUB and MFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LMUB	MFLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.27	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.19	+0.63

Drawdowns

LMUB vs. MFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMUB drawdown since its inception was -5.51%, smaller than the maximum MFLX drawdown of -26.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMUB and MFLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMUB	MFLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.51%	-26.76%	+21.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.11%	-3.11%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.78%	+3.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.61%	-8.17%	+6.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	0.77%	+0.12%

Volatility

LMUB vs. MFLX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB) and First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX) have volatilities of 1.44% and 1.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMUB	MFLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.44%	1.41%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.05%	2.98%	+0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.21%	4.08%	+0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.97%	10.36%	-4.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.97%	11.29%	-5.32%

LMUB vs. MFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMUB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MFLX's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMUB vs. MFLX - Dividend Comparison

LMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than MFLX's 4.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
LMUB iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF	3.77%	3.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MFLX First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF	4.08%	4.06%	3.81%	3.65%	4.27%	3.69%	3.21%	2.94%	3.74%	3.80%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMUB and MFLX in my portfolio?

LMUB and MFLX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMUB or MFLX?

LMUB has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to MFLX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMUB dropped -5.51% vs MFLX's -26.76%.

Which ETF is better, LMUB or MFLX?

On 1-year performance, LMUB leads with 9.37% vs 9.22% for MFLX. On fees, LMUB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LMUB or MFLX?

Over the 1-year period, LMUB has performed better with a 9.37% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LMUB or MFLX?

LMUB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for MFLX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LMUB or MFLX?

MFLX has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 3.77% for LMUB.

What is the main difference between LMUB and MFLX?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LMUB and 0.88% for MFLX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.