PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMSMX vs. NPCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LMSMX vs. NPCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX) and Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LMSMX vs. NPCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LMSMX
Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund
0.18%12.15%-1.72%5.13%-23.44%1.54%
NPCT
Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund
3.03%9.87%17.23%7.78%-37.50%-4.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMSMX achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than NPCT's 3.03% return.


LMSMX

1D
0.38%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
0.18%
6M
2.13%
1Y
7.23%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
-1.80%
10Y*

NPCT

1D
3.35%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
3.03%
6M
-1.87%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LMSMX vs. NPCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMSMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NPCT's 5.08% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LMSMX vs. NPCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMSMX
LMSMX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
LMSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LMSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NPCT
NPCT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NPCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPCT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NPCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPCT Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMSMX vs. NPCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX) and Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMSMXNPCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

0.64

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

0.99

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.02

+0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.92

2.56

+3.37

LMSMX vs. NPCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the NPCT Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMSMX and NPCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMSMXNPCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

0.64

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

-0.25

+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between LMSMX and NPCT is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LMSMX vs. NPCT - Dividend Comparison

LMSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than NPCT's 12.55% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMSMX
Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund
4.39%4.20%5.24%4.68%3.40%3.78%6.84%7.19%3.18%3.24%
NPCT
Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund
12.55%13.15%12.20%10.28%11.93%3.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LMSMX vs. NPCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMSMX drawdown since its inception was -30.76%, smaller than the maximum NPCT drawdown of -46.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMSMX and NPCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LMSMXNPCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.76%

-46.77%

+16.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.83%

-7.30%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.35%

-16.35%

+3.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-25.61%

+15.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

2.90%

-1.46%

Volatility

LMSMX vs. NPCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX) is 1.51%, while Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that LMSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LMSMXNPCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

4.90%

-3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.45%

6.53%

-4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.95%

11.93%

-4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.39%

13.15%

-2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.22%

13.15%

-4.93%