LMSMX vs. LCILX
Compare and contrast key facts about Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX) and ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX).
LMSMX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Dec 27, 2006. LCILX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Mar 31, 2015.
Performance
LMSMX vs. LCILX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LMSMX vs. LCILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMSMX Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund | 0.18% | 12.15% | -1.72% | 5.13% | -23.44% | -2.32% | 12.86% | 7.71% | 1.46% | 5.52% |
LCILX ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund | -5.98% | 10.49% | 14.36% | 16.68% | -20.85% | 24.76% | 35.82% | 37.85% | -2.40% | 19.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMSMX achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than LCILX's -5.98% return.
LMSMX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 7.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- -1.80%
- 10Y*
- —
LCILX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -7.96%
- YTD
- -5.98%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- 10.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.47%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LMSMX vs. LCILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMSMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LCILX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LMSMX vs. LCILX — Risk / Return Rank
LMSMX
LCILX
LMSMX vs. LCILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX) and ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMSMX | LCILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 0.66 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 1.08 | +0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.16 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 0.83 | +0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | 3.80 | +2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMSMX | LCILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 0.66 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.32 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.68 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between LMSMX and LCILX is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LMSMX vs. LCILX - Dividend Comparison
LMSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than LCILX's 5.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMSMX Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund | 4.39% | 4.20% | 5.24% | 4.68% | 3.40% | 3.78% | 6.84% | 7.19% | 3.18% | 3.24% | 0.00% |
LCILX ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund | 5.18% | 4.87% | 6.02% | 0.75% | 0.42% | 1.42% | 4.18% | 0.61% | 0.56% | 0.73% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
LMSMX vs. LCILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMSMX drawdown since its inception was -30.76%, roughly equal to the maximum LCILX drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMSMX and LCILX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMSMX | LCILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.76% | -31.70% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.83% | -11.20% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.18% | -27.19% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.35% | -8.74% | -4.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.07% | -5.36% | -4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 2.44% | -1.00% |
Volatility
LMSMX vs. LCILX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX) is 1.51%, while ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that LMSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LMSMX | LCILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 4.24% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.45% | 8.74% | -6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.95% | 17.38% | -10.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.39% | 17.29% | -6.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.22% | 18.11% | -9.89% |