PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LMSFX vs. BATVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LMSFX vs. BATVX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LMSFX (Federated Hermes Municipal Bond Fund) and BATVX (BlackRock Allocation Target Shares) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, LMSFX returned -0.16%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for BATVX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LMSFX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BATVX.

Performance

LMSFX vs. BATVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Municipal Bond Fund (LMSFX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMSFX achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than BATVX's 0.97% return.

LMSFX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.80%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.93%
1Y
5.71%
3Y*
2.79%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*
1.55%

BATVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.22%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMSFX vs. BATVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LMSFX
Federated Hermes Municipal Bond Fund		1.52%2.35%0.97%6.33%-11.32%0.99%
BATVX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares		0.97%2.80%2.48%1.41%-0.10%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LMSFX and BATVX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Federated Hermes Municipal Bond Fund

BlackRock Allocation Target Shares

Often compared with LMSFX:
LMSFX vs. DFCMXLMSFX vs. ISCAXLMSFX vs. KAUFXLMSFX vs. NMTRXLMSFX vs. ATOIXLMSFX vs. APUSXLMSFX vs. USMSX
Often compared with BATVX:
BATVX vs. CBTAXBATVX vs. FOHFXBATVX vs. COLTXBATVX vs. SEPAXBATVX vs. VPALXBATVX vs. PTEAXBATVX vs. NMTRX

Return for Risk

LMSFX vs. BATVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LMSFX
LMSFX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LMSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LMSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
BATVX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMSFX vs. BATVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Municipal Bond Fund (LMSFX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

LMSFXBATVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.15
3.57

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.51

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.48

—

—

LMSFX vs. BATVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMSFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the BATVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMSFX and BATVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMSFX vs. BATVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMSFX drawdown since its inception was -36.23%, which is greater than BATVX's maximum drawdown of -0.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMSFX and BATVX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LMSFXBATVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.23%

-0.20%

-36.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

0.00%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.28%

-0.10%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.47%

-0.20%

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.47%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

0.00%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-0.03%

-2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

0.00%

+1.42%

Volatility

LMSFX vs. BATVX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Municipal Bond Fund (LMSFX) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX) at 0.20%. This indicates that LMSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LMSFXBATVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.20%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.15%

0.49%

+1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26%

0.73%

+2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.83%

0.64%

+4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.46%

0.63%

+3.83%

LMSFX vs. BATVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMSFX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than BATVX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMSFX vs. BATVX - Dividend Comparison

LMSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than BATVX's 2.55% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATVX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares		2.55%2.76%2.44%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMSFX
Federated Hermes Municipal Bond Fund		2.00%3.23%2.43%2.20%1.89%2.85%2.72%3.89%3.38%2.92%3.05%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

LMSFX and BATVX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMSFX has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to BATVX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMSFX dropped -36.23% vs BATVX's -0.20%.

BATVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMSFX and BATVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer