LMNX vs. XTAP
LMNX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LMNX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.
Performance
LMNX vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMNX achieves a -62.00% return, which is significantly lower than XTAP's 10.96% return.
LMNX
- 1D
- -17.92%
- 1M
- -12.57%
- YTD
- -62.00%
- 6M
- -66.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTAP
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- —
LMNX vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LMNX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF | -62.00% | 82.13% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 10.96% | 3.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMNX and XTAP is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMNX vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank
LMNX
XTAP
LMNX vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF (LMNX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMNX | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 0.80 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
LMNX vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMNX drawdown since its inception was -78.77%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMNX and XTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMNX | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.77% | -22.13% | -56.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.22% | -0.21% | -78.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.90% | -3.45% | -37.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.27% | — |
Volatility
LMNX vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMNX | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 173.88% | 4.70% | +169.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 173.88% | 14.54% | +159.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 173.88% | 14.41% | +159.47% |
LMNX vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMNX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMNX vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither LMNX nor XTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LMNX and XTAP have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for LMNX.
LMNX and XTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for LMNX and 0.79% for XTAP.
Find the right allocation for LMNX and XTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer