LMNX vs. SNAG
LMNX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF) and SNAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LMNX is actively managed, while SNAG is passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LMNX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SNAG.
Performance
LMNX vs. SNAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMNX achieves a -53.75% return, which is significantly higher than SNAG's -73.79% return.
LMNX
- 1D
- 6.45%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- -53.75%
- 6M
- -66.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNAG
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- -32.24%
- YTD
- -73.79%
- 6M
- -70.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LMNX vs. SNAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LMNX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF | -53.75% | -20.32% |
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF | -73.79% | 9.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMNX and SNAG is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMNX vs. SNAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF (LMNX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMNX vs. SNAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMNX drawdown since its inception was -79.62%, roughly equal to the maximum SNAG drawdown of -81.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMNX and SNAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMNX | SNAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.62% | -81.94% | +2.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.49% | -77.78% | +4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.23% | -55.36% | +12.13% |
Volatility
LMNX vs. SNAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMNX | SNAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 170.58% | 123.52% | +47.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.58% | 123.52% | +47.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.58% | 123.52% | +47.06% |
LMNX vs. SNAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMNX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SNAG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMNX vs. SNAG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LMNX nor SNAG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LMNX and SNAG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SNAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for LMNX.
LMNX and SNAG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for LMNX and 0.75% for SNAG.
Find the right allocation for LMNX and SNAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer