LMIYX vs. ETEGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund (LMIYX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX).
LMIYX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Jul 9, 1999. ETEGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997.
Performance
LMIYX vs. ETEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LMIYX vs. ETEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMIYX Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund | 0.25% | 11.02% | 27.28% | 6.14% | -29.10% | 32.54% | 79.45% | 34.34% | 2.19% | 38.54% |
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | -2.47% | -6.20% | 14.65% | 11.28% | -15.52% | 21.45% | 12.73% | 27.57% | -6.00% | 14.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMIYX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than ETEGX's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, LMIYX has outperformed ETEGX with an annualized return of 18.91%, while ETEGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.12% annualized return.
LMIYX
- 1D
- 5.66%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 35.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.48%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.91%
ETEGX
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -7.78%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -4.68%
- 1Y
- -5.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.10%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LMIYX vs. ETEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMIYX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ETEGX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LMIYX vs. ETEGX — Risk / Return Rank
LMIYX
ETEGX
LMIYX vs. ETEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund (LMIYX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMIYX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | -0.23 | +1.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | -0.20 | +2.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.98 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | -0.31 | +3.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.29 | -0.75 | +10.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMIYX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | -0.23 | +1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.08 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.41 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.27 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between LMIYX and ETEGX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LMIYX vs. ETEGX - Dividend Comparison
LMIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than ETEGX's 8.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMIYX Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 22.32% | 23.16% | 15.30% | 37.13% | 15.17% | 0.00% | 21.83% |
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 8.44% | 8.23% | 5.13% | 0.68% | 3.22% | 13.87% | 1.06% | 7.19% | 12.29% | 11.02% | 13.88% | 23.25% |
Drawdowns
LMIYX vs. ETEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMIYX drawdown since its inception was -61.35%, smaller than the maximum ETEGX drawdown of -67.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMIYX and ETEGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMIYX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.35% | -67.58% | +6.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.60% | -13.05% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.86% | -24.30% | -18.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.37% | -36.66% | -6.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.80% | -13.88% | +7.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.42% | -22.84% | +4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 5.47% | -1.79% |
Volatility
LMIYX vs. ETEGX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund (LMIYX) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) at 5.34%. This indicates that LMIYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LMIYX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 5.34% | +5.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.63% | 11.16% | +9.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.03% | 19.73% | +8.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.14% | 18.76% | +11.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.87% | 19.82% | +9.05% |