PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMGEX vs. QFVOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMGEX vs. QFVOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMGEX achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly lower than QFVOX's 19.24% return. Over the past 10 years, LMGEX has underperformed QFVOX with an annualized return of 8.34%, while QFVOX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.30% annualized return.


LMGEX

1D
2.74%
1M
2.28%
6M
6.76%
YTD
11.82%
1Y
25.09%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
8.34%
ALL TIME*
4.86%

QFVOX

1D
1.07%
1M
2.04%
6M
10.51%
YTD
19.24%
1Y
37.45%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
10.30%
ALL TIME*
7.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LMGEX vs. QFVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMGEX
Franklin International Equity Fund
11.82%32.05%3.42%18.48%-13.55%12.87%2.74%17.61%-16.67%23.58%
QFVOX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund
19.24%33.85%-0.70%19.88%-17.14%19.44%2.65%17.93%-13.28%25.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LMGEX and QFVOX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between LMGEX and QFVOX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMGEX vs. QFVOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LMGEX
LMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

QFVOX
QFVOX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QFVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QFVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LMGEX vs. QFVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMGEXQFVOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

3.23

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

11.47

-4.17

LMGEX vs. QFVOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMGEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the QFVOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMGEX and QFVOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMGEX vs. QFVOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMGEX drawdown since its inception was -63.37%, smaller than the maximum QFVOX drawdown of -70.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMGEX and QFVOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMGEXQFVOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.37%

-70.51%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.64%

-11.02%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.05%

-14.92%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.98%

-32.90%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.79%

-45.52%

+5.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.18%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.13%

-15.22%

-2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.11%

+0.14%

Volatility

LMGEX vs. QFVOX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX) at 4.22%. This indicates that LMGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QFVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMGEXQFVOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

4.22%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

13.83%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

15.43%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

15.58%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

16.37%

-0.42%

LMGEX vs. QFVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMGEX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than QFVOX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMGEX vs. QFVOX - Dividend Comparison

LMGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, more than QFVOX's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMGEX
Franklin International Equity Fund
7.40%8.28%5.68%1.51%2.88%5.10%0.58%0.49%1.62%1.60%1.30%0.91%
QFVOX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund
4.74%5.66%1.95%1.88%1.43%10.11%1.58%1.14%0.98%0.60%1.02%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMGEX and QFVOX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMGEX has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to QFVOX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMGEX dropped -63.37% vs QFVOX's -70.51%.

QFVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMGEX and QFVOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer