LMGEX vs. LCSSX
LMGEX (Franklin International Equity Fund) and LCSSX (ClearBridge Select Fund) are both mutual funds - LMGEX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Legg Mason, while LCSSX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Legg Mason. Over the past 10 years, LMGEX returned 8.29%/yr vs 16.95%/yr for LCSSX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LMGEX charges 2.05%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for LCSSX.
Performance
LMGEX vs. LCSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMGEX achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly higher than LCSSX's 3.46% return. Over the past 10 years, LMGEX has underperformed LCSSX with an annualized return of 8.29%, while LCSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
LMGEX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- 9.64%
- 1Y
- 23.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
LCSSX
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 3.46%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- 13.44%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
LMGEX vs. LCSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMGEX Franklin International Equity Fund | 9.43% | 32.05% | 3.42% | 18.48% | -13.55% | 12.87% | 2.74% | 17.61% | -16.67% | 23.58% |
LCSSX ClearBridge Select Fund | 3.46% | 7.26% | 21.54% | 24.25% | -33.06% | 20.27% | 58.86% | 33.60% | 10.56% | 39.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMGEX and LCSSX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2012 | 0.66 |
The correlation between LMGEX and LCSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMGEX vs. LCSSX — Risk / Return Rank
LMGEX
LCSSX
LMGEX vs. LCSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX) and ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMGEX | LCSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 0.93 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.74 | 2.85 | +3.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMGEX vs. LCSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMGEX drawdown since its inception was -63.37%, which is greater than LCSSX's maximum drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMGEX and LCSSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMGEX | LCSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.37% | -43.46% | -19.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.64% | -14.24% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.05% | -23.67% | +10.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.98% | -43.46% | +14.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.79% | -43.46% | +3.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -2.11% | +1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.19% | -9.17% | -9.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 4.63% | -1.35% |
Volatility
LMGEX vs. LCSSX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX) and ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) have volatilities of 4.88% and 5.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMGEX | LCSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 5.13% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.88% | 11.95% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.55% | 15.14% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 21.82% | -5.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 21.94% | -5.75% |
LMGEX vs. LCSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMGEX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSSX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMGEX vs. LCSSX - Dividend Comparison
LMGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, while LCSSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCSSX ClearBridge Select Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 3.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.28% | 2.11% | 1.12% | 5.25% |
LMGEX Franklin International Equity Fund | 7.57% | 8.28% | 5.68% | 1.51% | 2.88% | 5.10% | 0.58% | 0.49% | 1.62% | 1.60% | 1.30% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMGEX and LCSSX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCSSX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to LMGEX (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMGEX dropped -63.37% vs LCSSX's -43.46%.
LMGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMGEX and LCSSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer