PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMGAX vs. MGOYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMGAX vs. MGOYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Fund (LMGAX) and Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund (MGOYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMGAX achieves a 16.99% return, which is significantly lower than MGOYX's 19.17% return. Over the past 10 years, LMGAX has outperformed MGOYX with an annualized return of 12.07%, while MGOYX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.03% annualized return.


LMGAX

1D
0.45%
1M
5.69%
YTD
16.99%
6M
14.29%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
12.07%

MGOYX

1D
0.99%
1M
2.80%
YTD
19.17%
6M
18.86%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
11.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMGAX vs. MGOYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMGAX
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Fund
16.99%13.38%30.74%10.80%-32.59%6.76%40.17%36.75%-3.35%22.94%
MGOYX
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund
19.17%12.03%10.93%14.82%-21.31%25.97%20.61%26.22%-14.19%24.55%

Correlation

The correlation between LMGAX and MGOYX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 1998

0.90

The correlation between LMGAX and MGOYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMGAX vs. MGOYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMGAX
LMGAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LMGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LMGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

MGOYX
MGOYX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MGOYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGOYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGOYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MGOYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGOYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMGAX vs. MGOYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Fund (LMGAX) and Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund (MGOYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMGAXMGOYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.38

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.85

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.84

14.85

-10.00

LMGAX vs. MGOYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the MGOYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMGAX and MGOYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMGAXMGOYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.15

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.33

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.48

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.46

0.00

Drawdowns

LMGAX vs. MGOYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMGAX drawdown since its inception was -49.96%, smaller than the maximum MGOYX drawdown of -57.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMGAX and MGOYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMGAXMGOYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.96%

-57.23%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.99%

-7.81%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.19%

-26.05%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.72%

-40.49%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.72%

-40.49%

-2.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.21%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.79%

-10.96%

-1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.55%

2.02%

+3.53%

Volatility

LMGAX vs. MGOYX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Fund (LMGAX) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund (MGOYX) at 4.63%. This indicates that LMGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGOYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMGAXMGOYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

4.63%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.15%

11.07%

+7.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.31%

13.98%

+9.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.91%

25.06%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

23.26%

+0.45%

LMGAX vs. MGOYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMGAX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than MGOYX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMGAX vs. MGOYX - Dividend Comparison

LMGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, less than MGOYX's 12.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMGAX
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Fund
6.48%7.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%18.94%15.52%5.62%6.14%9.04%3.22%13.75%
MGOYX
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund
12.90%15.37%15.72%4.54%12.23%25.13%18.63%60.72%49.01%19.34%12.76%10.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMGAX and MGOYX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMGAX has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to MGOYX (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMGAX dropped -49.96% vs MGOYX's -57.23%.

MGOYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMGAX and MGOYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer