PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMECX vs. LMSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMECX vs. LMSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund (LMECX) and Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMECX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than LMSMX's 0.82% return.


LMECX

1D
0.34%
1M
-0.51%
6M
-0.49%
YTD
0.40%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
2.30%
5Y*
-4.15%
10Y*
0.46%
ALL TIME*
2.68%

LMSMX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.51%
6M
0.18%
YTD
0.82%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
-2.43%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LMECX vs. LMSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMECX
Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund
0.40%9.89%-3.64%7.36%-29.11%0.34%1.70%19.29%-2.74%8.33%
LMSMX
Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund
0.82%12.15%-1.72%5.13%-23.44%-2.32%12.86%7.71%1.46%5.52%

Correlation

The correlation between LMECX and LMSMX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.50

The correlation between LMECX and LMSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMECX vs. LMSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LMECX
LMECX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LMECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMECX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LMECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMECX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

LMSMX
LMSMX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LMSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LMSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LMECX vs. LMSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund (LMECX) and Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMECXLMSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.26

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

2.35

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.99

5.83

-1.84

LMECX vs. LMSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMECX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the LMSMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMECX and LMSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMECX vs. LMSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMECX drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, which is greater than LMSMX's maximum drawdown of -30.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMECX and LMSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMECXLMSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.92%

-30.76%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.26%

-2.64%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.43%

-10.50%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.92%

-30.12%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.50%

-12.80%

-7.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-10.16%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

1.06%

+0.10%

Volatility

LMECX vs. LMSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund (LMECX) is 0.93%, while Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that LMECX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMECXLMSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

1.14%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.11%

2.99%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63%

4.68%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.05%

10.37%

-1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.33%

8.11%

+0.22%

LMECX vs. LMSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMECX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LMSMX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LMECX vs. LMSMX - Dividend Comparison

LMECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than LMSMX's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMECX
Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund
4.20%4.90%6.36%6.13%0.94%6.37%1.45%8.12%4.65%7.29%5.70%6.43%
LMSMX
Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund
4.52%4.20%5.24%4.68%3.40%3.78%6.84%7.19%3.18%3.24%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMECX and LMSMX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMSMX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to LMECX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMECX dropped -36.92% vs LMSMX's -30.76%.

LMSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMECX and LMSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer