PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMECX vs. LMGEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMECX vs. LMGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund (LMECX) and Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMECX achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than LMGEX's 6.84% return. Over the past 10 years, LMECX has underperformed LMGEX with an annualized return of 0.82%, while LMGEX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.84% annualized return.


LMECX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.59%
6M
1.23%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
-4.05%
10Y*
0.82%

LMGEX

1D
-0.73%
1M
1.96%
YTD
6.84%
6M
9.01%
1Y
17.68%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
7.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMECX vs. LMGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMECX
Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund
0.59%9.89%-3.64%7.36%-29.11%0.34%1.70%19.29%-2.74%8.93%
LMGEX
Franklin International Equity Fund
6.84%32.05%3.42%18.48%-13.55%12.87%2.74%17.61%-16.67%23.58%

Correlation

The correlation between LMECX and LMGEX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2012

0.41

The correlation between LMECX and LMGEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMECX vs. LMGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMECX
LMECX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LMECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMECX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LMECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMECX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

LMGEX
LMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
LMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
LMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMECX vs. LMGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund (LMECX) and Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMECXLMGEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.22

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.54

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.28

5.52

+0.76

LMECX vs. LMGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMECX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the LMGEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMECX and LMGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMECXLMGEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.19

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

0.52

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.49

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.27

+0.10

Drawdowns

LMECX vs. LMGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMECX drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, smaller than the maximum LMGEX drawdown of -63.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMECX and LMGEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMECXLMGEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.92%

-63.37%

+26.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.26%

-11.64%

+7.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-13.05%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.92%

-28.98%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.92%

-39.79%

+2.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.36%

-2.80%

-17.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.51%

-18.21%

+8.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

3.25%

-2.22%

Volatility

LMECX vs. LMGEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund (LMECX) is 1.54%, while Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that LMECX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMECXLMGEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

4.58%

-3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.98%

12.32%

-8.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.53%

15.16%

-10.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.07%

15.81%

-6.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.34%

16.18%

-7.84%

LMECX vs. LMGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMECX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LMGEX's 2.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMECX vs. LMGEX - Dividend Comparison

LMECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than LMGEX's 7.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMECX
Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund
4.91%4.90%6.36%6.13%0.94%6.37%1.45%8.12%4.65%7.29%5.70%6.43%
LMGEX
Franklin International Equity Fund
7.75%8.28%5.68%1.51%2.88%5.10%0.58%0.49%1.62%1.60%1.30%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMECX and LMGEX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMGEX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to LMECX (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMECX dropped -36.92% vs LMGEX's -63.37%.

LMECX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMECX and LMGEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer