PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMECX vs. FOCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMECX vs. FOCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund (LMECX) and Fairholme Focused Income Fund (FOCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMECX achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than FOCIX's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, LMECX has underperformed FOCIX with an annualized return of 0.82%, while FOCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.06% annualized return.


LMECX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.59%
6M
1.23%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
-4.05%
10Y*
0.82%

FOCIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
6.99%
6M
6.13%
1Y
11.18%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
7.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMECX vs. FOCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMECX
Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund
0.59%9.89%-3.64%7.36%-29.11%0.34%1.70%19.29%-2.74%8.93%
FOCIX
Fairholme Focused Income Fund
6.99%6.17%14.67%12.58%6.00%6.73%0.99%7.44%-6.88%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between LMECX and FOCIX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2012

0.21

The correlation between LMECX and FOCIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMECX vs. FOCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMECX
LMECX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LMECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMECX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LMECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMECX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCIX
FOCIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FOCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMECX vs. FOCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund (LMECX) and Fairholme Focused Income Fund (FOCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMECXFOCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

3.09

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.28

9.09

-2.80

LMECX vs. FOCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMECX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the FOCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMECX and FOCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMECXFOCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

0.87

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.78

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.79

-0.42

Drawdowns

LMECX vs. FOCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMECX drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, which is greater than FOCIX's maximum drawdown of -18.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMECX and FOCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMECXFOCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.92%

-18.78%

-18.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.26%

-3.33%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-7.96%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.92%

-12.36%

-24.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.92%

-18.61%

-18.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.36%

-2.15%

-18.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.51%

-4.77%

-4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

1.13%

-0.10%

Volatility

LMECX vs. FOCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund (LMECX) is 1.54%, while Fairholme Focused Income Fund (FOCIX) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that LMECX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMECXFOCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

2.55%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.98%

5.64%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.53%

7.41%

-2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.07%

9.76%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.34%

9.07%

-0.73%

LMECX vs. FOCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMECX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMECX vs. FOCIX - Dividend Comparison

LMECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than FOCIX's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOCIX
Fairholme Focused Income Fund
1.23%1.31%2.46%2.82%2.24%1.12%0.65%2.75%4.57%9.83%5.16%5.51%
LMECX
Western Asset SMASh Series Core Plus Completion Fund
4.91%4.90%6.36%6.13%0.94%6.37%1.45%8.12%4.65%7.29%5.70%6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMECX and FOCIX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOCIX has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to LMECX (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMECX dropped -36.92% vs FOCIX's -18.78%.

LMECX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMECX and FOCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer