LLYX vs. IWMY
LLYX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LLYX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while IWMY is a Options Trading fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. LLYX is actively managed, while IWMY is passively managed. Over the past year, LLYX returned 58.74% vs 23.33% for IWMY. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LLYX charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IWMY.
Performance
LLYX vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLYX achieves a -9.81% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 12.25% return.
LLYX
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- 23.54%
- YTD
- -9.81%
- 6M
- -3.59%
- 1Y
- 58.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMY
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 23.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLYX vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LLYX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF | -9.81% | 44.29% | -23.40% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 12.25% | 10.18% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLYX and IWMY is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2024 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLYX vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank
LLYX
IWMY
LLYX vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF (LLYX) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LLYX | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.26 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 2.03 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.68 | 6.66 | -3.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLYX | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.49 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.95 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
LLYX vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLYX drawdown since its inception was -67.98%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLYX and IWMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLYX | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.98% | -18.72% | -49.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.36% | -11.57% | -35.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.95% | -1.36% | -20.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.60% | -2.98% | -30.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.00% | 3.51% | +18.49% |
Volatility
LLYX vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF (LLYX) has a higher volatility of 18.20% compared to Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) at 5.42%. This indicates that LLYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLYX | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.20% | 5.42% | +12.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.69% | 12.62% | +40.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.98% | 15.69% | +59.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.29% | 15.75% | +60.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.29% | 15.75% | +60.54% |
LLYX vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLYX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
LLYX vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison
LLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than IWMY's 45.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 45.96% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% |
LLYX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF | 3.06% | 2.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLYX and IWMY have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LLYX has higher volatility (18.20%) compared to IWMY (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLYX dropped -67.98% vs IWMY's -18.72%.
On 1-year performance, LLYX leads with 58.74% vs 23.33% for IWMY. On fees, IWMY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LLYX has performed better with a 58.74% return vs 23.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWMY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for LLYX.
IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 45.96%, compared with 3.06% for LLYX.
LLYX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IWMY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.32% for LLYX and 0.99% for IWMY.
IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LLYX and IWMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer