PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLII vs. NVDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLII vs. NVDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLII achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than NVDX's 17.35% return.


LLII

1D
1.47%
1M
9.79%
YTD
-4.28%
6M
0.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDX

1D
-7.03%
1M
14.15%
YTD
17.35%
6M
23.60%
1Y
75.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLII vs. NVDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LLII
REX LLY Growth & Income ETF
-4.28%19.03%
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
17.35%-15.96%

Correlation

The correlation between LLII and NVDX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLII vs. NVDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLII

NVDX
NVDX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLII vs. NVDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LLII vs. NVDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLIINVDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.44

-0.73

Drawdowns

LLII vs. NVDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLII drawdown since its inception was -23.96%, smaller than the maximum NVDX drawdown of -68.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLII and NVDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLIINVDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.96%

-68.19%

+44.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

-18.27%

+11.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-20.28%

+11.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.27%

Volatility

LLII vs. NVDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLIINVDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.42%

68.45%

-32.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.42%

95.58%

-59.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.42%

95.58%

-59.16%

LLII vs. NVDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

LLII vs. NVDX - Dividend Comparison

LLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.95%, more than NVDX's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
LLII
REX LLY Growth & Income ETF
25.95%5.13%0.00%
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
2.85%3.35%15.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


LLII and NVDX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LLII is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LLII is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDX.

LLII has the higher dividend yield at 25.95%, compared with 2.85% for NVDX.

LLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVDX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LLII and 1.05% for NVDX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLII and NVDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer