LLII vs. NVDX
LLII (REX LLY Growth & Income ETF) and NVDX (T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while NVDX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. LLII charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDX.
Performance
LLII vs. NVDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLII achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than NVDX's -0.29% return.
LLII
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDX
- 1D
- -8.23%
- 1M
- -16.04%
- YTD
- -0.29%
- 6M
- -3.65%
- 1Y
- 44.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLII vs. NVDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF | 2.07% | 19.74% |
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | -0.29% | -22.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLII and NVDX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLII vs. NVDX — Risk / Return Rank
LLII
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NVDX
LLII vs. NVDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LLII | NVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LLII vs. NVDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLII drawdown since its inception was -23.96%, smaller than the maximum NVDX drawdown of -68.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLII and NVDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLII | NVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.96% | -68.19% | +44.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -43.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -30.55% | +29.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.63% | -20.34% | +11.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.08% | — |
Volatility
LLII vs. NVDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLII | NVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 26.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 53.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.58% | 70.94% | -35.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.58% | 95.51% | -59.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.58% | 95.51% | -59.93% |
LLII vs. NVDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
LLII vs. NVDX - Dividend Comparison
LLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.62%, more than NVDX's 3.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF | 25.62% | 5.13% | 0.00% |
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 3.36% | 3.35% | 15.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLII and NVDX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LLII is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LLII is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDX.
LLII has the higher dividend yield at 25.62%, compared with 3.36% for NVDX.
LLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVDX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LLII and 1.05% for NVDX.
Find the right allocation for LLII and NVDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer