PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLII vs. IXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLII vs. IXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLII achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 32.22% return.


LLII

1D
1.47%
1M
9.79%
YTD
-4.28%
6M
0.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IXC

1D
0.87%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
32.22%
6M
30.00%
1Y
48.10%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
19.64%
10Y*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLII vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LLII
REX LLY Growth & Income ETF
-4.28%19.03%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
32.22%3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between LLII and IXC is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLII vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLII

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLII vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LLII vs. IXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLIIIXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.32

+0.39

Drawdowns

LLII vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLII drawdown since its inception was -23.96%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLII and IXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLIIIXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.96%

-67.88%

+43.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

-4.84%

-2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-17.48%

+8.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

Volatility

LLII vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLIIIXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.42%

18.75%

+17.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.42%

23.50%

+12.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.42%

26.85%

+9.57%

LLII vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

LLII vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison

LLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.95%, more than IXC's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
2.79%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%
LLII
REX LLY Growth & Income ETF
25.95%5.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LLII and IXC have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IXC is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LLII.

LLII has the higher dividend yield at 25.95%, compared with 2.79% for IXC.

LLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while IXC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LLII and 0.46% for IXC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLII and IXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer