LLII vs. EDGH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LLII (REX LLY Growth & Income ETF) and EDGH (3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while EDGH is a Commodities fund actively managed by 3EDGE Asset Management. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LLII charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for EDGH.

Performance

LLII vs. EDGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLII achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than EDGH's 12.49% return.

LLII

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 9.79%
• YTD: -4.28%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EDGH

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -1.84%
• YTD: 12.49%
• 6M: 14.30%
• 1Y: 31.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLII vs. EDGH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF	-4.28%	19.03%
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF	12.49%	8.06%

Correlation

The correlation between LLII and EDGH is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.01

Return for Risk

LLII vs. EDGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGH

EDGH Risk / Return Rank: 54
EDGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
EDGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
EDGH Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EDGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EDGH Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLII vs. EDGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LLII	EDGH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	1.53	-0.82

Drawdowns

LLII vs. EDGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLII drawdown since its inception was -23.96%, which is greater than EDGH's maximum drawdown of -10.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLII and EDGH.

Drawdown Indicators

	LLII	EDGH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.96%	-10.60%	-13.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.88%	-4.80%	-2.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.28%	-2.04%	-7.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.23%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LLII	EDGH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.42%	17.72%	+18.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.42%	15.60%	+20.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.42%	15.60%	+20.82%

LLII vs. EDGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than EDGH's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

LLII vs. EDGH - Dividend Comparison

LLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.95%, more than EDGH's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF	1.05%	1.18%	3.19%
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF	25.95%	5.13%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LLII and EDGH in my portfolio?

LLII and EDGH have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LLII or EDGH?

On fees, LLII is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LLII or EDGH?

LLII is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EDGH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LLII or EDGH?

LLII has the higher dividend yield at 25.95%, compared with 1.05% for EDGH.

What is the main difference between LLII and EDGH?

LLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while EDGH is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: REX and 3EDGE Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LLII and 1.01% for EDGH.