PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLII vs. DRLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLII vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLII achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 31.26% return.


LLII

1D
1.47%
1M
9.79%
YTD
-4.28%
6M
0.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRLL

1D
1.47%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
31.26%
6M
27.14%
1Y
43.09%
3Y*
14.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLII vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LLII
REX LLY Growth & Income ETF
-4.28%19.03%
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
31.26%2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between LLII and DRLL is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLII vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLII

DRLL
DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLII vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LLII vs. DRLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLIIDRLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.57

+0.14

Drawdowns

LLII vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLII drawdown since its inception was -23.96%, roughly equal to the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLII and DRLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLIIDRLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.96%

-23.73%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

-8.10%

+1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-8.02%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

Volatility

LLII vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLIIDRLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.42%

22.34%

+14.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.42%

23.76%

+12.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.42%

23.76%

+12.66%

LLII vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

LLII vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison

LLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.95%, more than DRLL's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
2.33%2.99%3.00%3.01%1.18%
LLII
REX LLY Growth & Income ETF
25.95%5.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LLII and DRLL have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LLII.

LLII has the higher dividend yield at 25.95%, compared with 2.33% for DRLL.

LLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LLII and 0.41% for DRLL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLII and DRLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer