LLHE.TO vs. RCDC.TO
LLHE.TO (Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and RCDC.TO (RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LLHE.TO returned 49.98% vs 29.08% for RCDC.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LLHE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for RCDC.TO.
Performance
LLHE.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLHE.TO achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than RCDC.TO's 12.49% return.
LLHE.TO
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 14.44%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 49.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RCDC.TO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 12.49%
- 6M
- 14.54%
- 1Y
- 29.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLHE.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LLHE.TO Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 3.96% | 29.60% | -16.36% |
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF | 12.49% | 19.29% | 7.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLHE.TO and RCDC.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLHE.TO vs. RCDC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LLHE.TO
RCDC.TO
LLHE.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) and RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LLHE.TO | RCDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.67 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 5.38 | -3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 26.80 | -21.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLHE.TO | RCDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 3.54 | -2.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 1.50 | -1.33 |
Drawdowns
LLHE.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.80%, which is greater than RCDC.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLHE.TO and RCDC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLHE.TO | RCDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.80% | -10.88% | -26.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.14% | -5.43% | -19.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -0.19% | -2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -1.87% | -11.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.78% | 1.09% | +8.69% |
Volatility
LLHE.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) at 2.49%. This indicates that LLHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCDC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLHE.TO | RCDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.63% | 2.49% | +6.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.97% | 6.71% | +22.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.18% | 8.25% | +31.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.78% | 10.15% | +31.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.78% | 10.15% | +31.63% |
LLHE.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLHE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RCDC.TO's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
LLHE.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Dividend Comparison
LLHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.31%, more than RCDC.TO's 6.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LLHE.TO Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 21.31% | 20.89% | 7.40% | 0.00% |
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF | 6.33% | 6.38% | 6.46% | 6.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLHE.TO and RCDC.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LLHE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LLHE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for RCDC.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and RBC. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LLHE.TO and 0.64% for RCDC.TO.
Find the right allocation for LLHE.TO and RCDC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer