PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLHE.TO achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ.TO's 11.09% return.


LLHE.TO

1D
1.73%
1M
14.44%
YTD
3.96%
6M
8.11%
1Y
49.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JEPQ.TO

1D
0.41%
1M
6.30%
YTD
11.09%
6M
9.59%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LLHE.TO and JEPQ.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLHE.TO
LLHE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LLHE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ.TO
JEPQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
JEPQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LLHE.TOJEPQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.48

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

4.08

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.13

16.30

-11.17

LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLHE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the JEPQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLHE.TO and JEPQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLHE.TOJEPQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.51

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

1.34

-1.18

Drawdowns

LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.80%, which is greater than JEPQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLHE.TO and JEPQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLHE.TOJEPQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.80%

-20.05%

-17.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.14%

-7.74%

-17.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-0.40%

-2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.72%

-3.36%

-10.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.78%

1.93%

+7.85%

Volatility

LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO) at 4.05%. This indicates that LLHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLHE.TOJEPQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.63%

4.05%

+4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.97%

9.88%

+19.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.18%

12.58%

+27.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.78%

17.35%

+24.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.78%

17.35%

+24.43%

LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLHE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

LLHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.31%, more than JEPQ.TO's 10.00% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


LLHE.TO and JEPQ.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JEPQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JEPQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LLHE.TO.

LLHE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while JEPQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LLHE.TO and 0.35% for JEPQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLHE.TO and JEPQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer