LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO
LLHE.TO (Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and JEPQ.TO (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LLHE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while JEPQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LLHE.TO returned 49.98% vs 31.41% for JEPQ.TO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LLHE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.TO.
Performance
LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLHE.TO achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ.TO's 11.09% return.
LLHE.TO
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 14.44%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 49.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LLHE.TO Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 3.96% | 29.60% | -9.25% |
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 11.09% | 10.46% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLHE.TO and JEPQ.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LLHE.TO
JEPQ.TO
LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LLHE.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.48 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 4.08 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 16.30 | -11.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLHE.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 2.51 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 1.34 | -1.18 |
Drawdowns
LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.80%, which is greater than JEPQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLHE.TO and JEPQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLHE.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.80% | -20.05% | -17.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.14% | -7.74% | -17.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -0.40% | -2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -3.36% | -10.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.78% | 1.93% | +7.85% |
Volatility
LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO) at 4.05%. This indicates that LLHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLHE.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.63% | 4.05% | +4.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.97% | 9.88% | +19.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.18% | 12.58% | +27.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.78% | 17.35% | +24.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.78% | 17.35% | +24.43% |
LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLHE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LLHE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
LLHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.31%, more than JEPQ.TO's 10.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 10.00% | 10.34% | 5.50% |
LLHE.TO Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 21.31% | 20.89% | 7.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLHE.TO and JEPQ.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JEPQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LLHE.TO.
LLHE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while JEPQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LLHE.TO and 0.35% for JEPQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for LLHE.TO and JEPQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer