PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LLHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LLHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLHE.TO achieves a -14.25% return, which is significantly lower than HBIL.TO's -0.05% return.


LLHE.TO

1D
3.12%
1M
-12.96%
YTD
-14.25%
6M
18.79%
1Y
4.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBIL.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.35%
1Y
1.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LLHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLHE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HBIL.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LLHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLHE.TO
LLHE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LLHE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

HBIL.TO
HBIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LLHE.TOHBIL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.11

0.85

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.48

1.19

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.16

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

1.33

-1.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.47

3.88

-3.41

LLHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLHE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLHE.TO and HBIL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLHE.TOHBIL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

0.85

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.49

-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between LLHE.TO and HBIL.TO is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LLHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison

LLHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.70%, more than HBIL.TO's 6.67% yield.


Drawdowns

LLHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.80%, which is greater than HBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLHE.TO and HBIL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LLHE.TOHBIL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.80%

-1.69%

-36.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.71%

-1.30%

-30.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.81%

-0.95%

-16.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.93%

-0.48%

-13.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.15%

0.45%

+12.70%

Volatility

LLHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.90% compared to Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) at 0.72%. This indicates that LLHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LLHE.TOHBIL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.90%

0.72%

+9.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.33%

1.14%

+26.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.35%

1.86%

+44.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.78%

2.06%

+39.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.78%

2.06%

+39.72%