LLHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO
LLHE.TO (Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and CBNK.TO (Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LLHE.TO returned 49.98% vs 79.20% for CBNK.TO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LLHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLHE.TO achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than CBNK.TO's 25.56% return.
LLHE.TO
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 14.44%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 49.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBNK.TO
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 7.74%
- YTD
- 25.56%
- 6M
- 32.17%
- 1Y
- 79.20%
- 3Y*
- 38.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LLHE.TO Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 3.96% | 29.60% | -16.36% |
CBNK.TO Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF | 25.56% | 51.67% | 17.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLHE.TO and CBNK.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LLHE.TO
CBNK.TO
LLHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) and Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LLHE.TO | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.87 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 7.94 | -5.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 34.25 | -29.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLHE.TO | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 5.12 | -3.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 1.10 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
LLHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.80%, which is greater than CBNK.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLHE.TO and CBNK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLHE.TO | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.80% | -32.12% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.14% | -10.03% | -15.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -2.29% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -10.92% | -2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.78% | 2.32% | +7.46% |
Volatility
LLHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO) at 5.67%. This indicates that LLHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLHE.TO | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.63% | 5.67% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.97% | 13.29% | +15.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.18% | 15.55% | +24.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.78% | 17.55% | +24.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.78% | 17.55% | +24.23% |
Dividends
LLHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison
LLHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.31%, more than CBNK.TO's 5.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBNK.TO Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF | 5.94% | 5.86% | 8.25% | 9.59% | 7.85% |
LLHE.TO Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 21.31% | 20.89% | 7.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLHE.TO and CBNK.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Mulvihill.
Find the right allocation for LLHE.TO and CBNK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer