PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLDYX vs. PSYPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) and Palmer Square Income Plus Fund (PSYPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLDYX achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than PSYPX's 0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, LLDYX has underperformed PSYPX with an annualized return of 2.70%, while PSYPX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.87% annualized return.


LLDYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.94%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
5.28%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
2.70%

PSYPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.69%
6M
0.79%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
3.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
0.52%6.19%5.13%5.41%-5.35%1.07%3.17%5.64%1.47%2.74%
PSYPX
Palmer Square Income Plus Fund
0.69%3.88%5.40%7.40%-0.77%1.17%3.65%5.29%1.17%4.03%

Correlation

The correlation between LLDYX and PSYPX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2014

0.25

The correlation between LLDYX and PSYPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLDYX vs. PSYPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLDYX
LLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

PSYPX
PSYPX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PSYPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSYPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSYPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PSYPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSYPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) and Palmer Square Income Plus Fund (PSYPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LLDYXPSYPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

2.39

-0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.77

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

12.66

-0.06

LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLDYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the PSYPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLDYX and PSYPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLDYX drawdown since its inception was -10.54%, smaller than the maximum PSYPX drawdown of -11.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLDYX and PSYPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLDYXPSYPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.54%

-11.43%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-1.38%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.29%

-1.77%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.43%

-3.15%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.67%

-11.43%

+1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

0.00%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-0.71%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

0.28%

+0.05%

Volatility

LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to Palmer Square Income Plus Fund (PSYPX) at 0.31%. This indicates that LLDYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSYPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLDYXPSYPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

0.31%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.70%

1.28%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42%

1.44%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

1.84%

+0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.60%

2.06%

+0.54%

LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLDYX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PSYPX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Dividend Comparison

LLDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than PSYPX's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
5.17%5.21%4.73%4.71%2.58%2.52%3.06%3.79%4.11%3.90%4.15%4.15%
PSYPX
Palmer Square Income Plus Fund
2.33%3.33%4.16%4.05%3.23%1.27%2.08%3.11%2.84%2.53%4.26%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


LLDYX and PSYPX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LLDYX has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to PSYPX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLDYX dropped -10.54% vs PSYPX's -11.43%.

PSYPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLDYX and PSYPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer