LLDYX vs. PSYPX
LLDYX (Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund) and PSYPX (Palmer Square Income Plus Fund) are both mutual funds - LLDYX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Lord Abbett, while PSYPX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Palmer Square. Over the past 10 years, LLDYX returned 2.70%/yr vs 3.87%/yr for PSYPX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LLDYX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSYPX.
Performance
LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLDYX achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than PSYPX's 0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, LLDYX has underperformed PSYPX with an annualized return of 2.70%, while PSYPX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.87% annualized return.
LLDYX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.70%
PSYPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.28%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 3.35%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLDYX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund | 0.52% | 6.19% | 5.13% | 5.41% | -5.35% | 1.07% | 3.17% | 5.64% | 1.47% | 2.74% |
PSYPX Palmer Square Income Plus Fund | 0.69% | 3.88% | 5.40% | 7.40% | -0.77% | 1.17% | 3.65% | 5.29% | 1.17% | 4.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLDYX and PSYPX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2014 | 0.25 |
The correlation between LLDYX and PSYPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLDYX vs. PSYPX — Risk / Return Rank
LLDYX
PSYPX
LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) and Palmer Square Income Plus Fund (PSYPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LLDYX | PSYPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 2.39 | -0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 2.77 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | 12.66 | -0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLDYX drawdown since its inception was -10.54%, smaller than the maximum PSYPX drawdown of -11.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLDYX and PSYPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLDYX | PSYPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.54% | -11.43% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | -1.38% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.29% | -1.77% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.43% | -3.15% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.67% | -11.43% | +1.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | 0.00% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -0.71% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.33% | 0.28% | +0.05% |
Volatility
LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to Palmer Square Income Plus Fund (PSYPX) at 0.31%. This indicates that LLDYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSYPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLDYX | PSYPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 0.31% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.70% | 1.28% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42% | 1.44% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.75% | 1.84% | +0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 2.06% | +0.54% |
LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLDYX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PSYPX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LLDYX vs. PSYPX - Dividend Comparison
LLDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than PSYPX's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLDYX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund | 5.17% | 5.21% | 4.73% | 4.71% | 2.58% | 2.52% | 3.06% | 3.79% | 4.11% | 3.90% | 4.15% | 4.15% |
PSYPX Palmer Square Income Plus Fund | 2.33% | 3.33% | 4.16% | 4.05% | 3.23% | 1.27% | 2.08% | 3.11% | 2.84% | 2.53% | 4.26% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLDYX and PSYPX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LLDYX has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to PSYPX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLDYX dropped -10.54% vs PSYPX's -11.43%.
PSYPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LLDYX and PSYPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer