PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLDYX vs. LISDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLDYX vs. LISDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLDYX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly higher than LISDX's 0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, LLDYX has outperformed LISDX with an annualized return of 2.65%, while LISDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.49% annualized return.


LLDYX

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.26%
6M
0.51%
YTD
0.93%
1Y
3.12%
3Y*
5.06%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
2.65%
ALL TIME*
2.94%

LISDX

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.73%
6M
-0.14%
YTD
0.49%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
3.24%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
1.49%
ALL TIME*
1.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LLDYX vs. LISDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
0.93%6.19%5.13%5.41%-5.35%1.07%3.17%5.64%1.47%2.74%
LISDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund
0.49%4.44%3.11%3.14%-4.38%0.55%2.18%4.43%1.30%1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LLDYX and LISDX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2008

0.36

The correlation between LLDYX and LISDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLDYX vs. LISDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LLDYX
LLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
LLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

LISDX
LISDX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LISDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LISDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LISDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LISDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LISDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LLDYX vs. LISDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LLDYXLISDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.50

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

1.79

+1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.99

5.45

+6.54

LLDYX vs. LISDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLDYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the LISDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLDYX and LISDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LLDYX vs. LISDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLDYX drawdown since its inception was -10.54%, which is greater than LISDX's maximum drawdown of -6.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLDYX and LISDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLDYXLISDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.54%

-6.72%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-1.44%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.29%

-1.72%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.43%

-6.72%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.67%

-6.72%

-2.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.78%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-0.81%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.47%

-0.13%

Volatility

LLDYX vs. LISDX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) has a higher volatility of 0.54% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX) at 0.37%. This indicates that LLDYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LISDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLDYXLISDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

0.37%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.71%

1.13%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35%

1.44%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.76%

1.65%

+1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.59%

1.77%

+0.82%

LLDYX vs. LISDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLDYX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than LISDX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

LLDYX vs. LISDX - Dividend Comparison

LLDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than LISDX's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LISDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund
2.76%3.53%3.06%2.34%1.12%1.05%1.58%2.15%1.74%1.31%1.29%1.22%
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
4.67%5.21%4.73%4.71%2.58%2.52%3.06%3.79%4.11%3.90%4.15%4.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


LLDYX and LISDX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LLDYX has higher volatility (0.54%) compared to LISDX (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLDYX dropped -10.54% vs LISDX's -6.72%.

LISDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLDYX and LISDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer