PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLDYX vs. FPNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLDYX vs. FPNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) and FPA New Income Fund (FPNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLDYX achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than FPNIX's -0.02% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LLDYX having a 2.72% annualized return and FPNIX not far ahead at 2.83%.


LLDYX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.78%
6M
1.21%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
2.72%

FPNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.12%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
0.14%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
2.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLDYX vs. FPNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
0.78%6.19%5.13%5.41%-5.35%1.07%3.17%5.64%1.47%2.74%
FPNIX
FPA New Income Fund
-0.02%6.71%4.58%6.78%-3.10%0.84%2.51%3.81%2.30%2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between LLDYX and FPNIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2004

0.35

The correlation between LLDYX and FPNIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLDYX vs. FPNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLDYX
LLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
LLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FPNIX
FPNIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FPNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FPNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLDYX vs. FPNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) and FPA New Income Fund (FPNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LLDYXFPNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.35

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

2.12

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.96

6.23

+7.73

LLDYX vs. FPNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLDYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the FPNIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLDYX and FPNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLDYXFPNIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.79

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

1.21

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

1.49

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

1.02

+0.07

Drawdowns

LLDYX vs. FPNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLDYX drawdown since its inception was -10.54%, smaller than the maximum FPNIX drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLDYX and FPNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLDYXFPNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.54%

-22.95%

+12.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-1.97%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.29%

-1.97%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.43%

-4.67%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.67%

-4.67%

-5.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-1.35%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-1.86%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

0.67%

-0.35%

Volatility

LLDYX vs. FPNIX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) and FPA New Income Fund (FPNIX) have volatilities of 0.73% and 0.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLDYXFPNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

0.75%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.68%

1.67%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40%

2.34%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.74%

2.44%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.59%

1.90%

+0.69%

LLDYX vs. FPNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLDYX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FPNIX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

LLDYX vs. FPNIX - Dividend Comparison

LLDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than FPNIX's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPNIX
FPA New Income Fund
3.82%3.36%4.39%3.37%2.13%1.24%2.17%2.63%3.10%2.84%2.31%1.87%
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
5.16%5.21%4.73%4.71%2.58%2.52%3.06%3.79%4.11%3.90%4.15%4.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


LLDYX and FPNIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPNIX has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to LLDYX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLDYX dropped -10.54% vs FPNIX's -22.95%.

LLDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLDYX and FPNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer