PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLDR vs. SPTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLDR vs. SPTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (LLDR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLDR achieves a -1.43% return, which is significantly lower than SPTB's -0.10% return.


LLDR

1D
-0.59%
1M
-2.24%
6M
-1.88%
YTD
-1.43%
1Y
3.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-3.06%

SPTB

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.42%
6M
-0.15%
YTD
-0.10%
1Y
3.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLDR vs. SPTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LLDR
Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF
-1.43%5.69%-9.39%
SPTB
State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF
-0.10%6.14%-3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LLDR and SPTB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.95

The correlation between LLDR and SPTB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLDR vs. SPTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLDR
LLDR Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTB
SPTB Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
SPTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTB Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTB Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLDR vs. SPTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (LLDR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LLDRSPTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.15

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

1.05

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

2.69

-1.53

LLDR vs. SPTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLDR Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the SPTB Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLDR and SPTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LLDR vs. SPTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, which is greater than SPTB's maximum drawdown of -4.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLDR and SPTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLDRSPTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.46%

-4.96%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-2.90%

-4.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.64%

-1.98%

-4.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-1.34%

-5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

1.13%

+1.77%

Volatility

LLDR vs. SPTB - Volatility Comparison

Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (LLDR) has a higher volatility of 2.37% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB) at 1.04%. This indicates that LLDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLDRSPTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

1.04%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.17%

2.66%

+3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.26%

3.55%

+4.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.99%

4.37%

+5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.99%

4.37%

+5.62%

LLDR vs. SPTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLDR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LLDR vs. SPTB - Dividend Comparison

LLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than SPTB's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
LLDR
Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF
4.69%4.42%1.20%
SPTB
State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF
4.20%4.23%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, LLDR and SPTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LLDR has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to SPTB (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLDR dropped -12.46% vs SPTB's -4.96%.

On 1-year performance, LLDR leads with 3.36% vs 3.04% for SPTB. On fees, SPTB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTB has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LLDR has performed better with a 3.36% return vs 3.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for LLDR.

LLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 4.20% for SPTB.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LLDR and 0.03% for SPTB.

SPTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLDR and SPTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer