LLDR vs. SPTB
LLDR (Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF) and SPTB (State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. Over the past year, LLDR returned 3.36% vs 3.04% for SPTB. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LLDR charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTB.
Performance
LLDR vs. SPTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLDR achieves a -1.43% return, which is significantly lower than SPTB's -0.10% return.
LLDR
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- 6M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -1.43%
- 1Y
- 3.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.06%
SPTB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 3.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.77%
LLDR vs. SPTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LLDR Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | -1.43% | 5.69% | -9.39% |
SPTB State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF | -0.10% | 6.14% | -3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLDR and SPTB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between LLDR and SPTB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLDR vs. SPTB — Risk / Return Rank
LLDR
SPTB
LLDR vs. SPTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (LLDR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LLDR | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.15 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 1.05 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | 2.69 | -1.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LLDR vs. SPTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, which is greater than SPTB's maximum drawdown of -4.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLDR and SPTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLDR | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.46% | -4.96% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.00% | -2.90% | -4.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.64% | -1.98% | -4.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -1.34% | -5.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 1.13% | +1.77% |
Volatility
LLDR vs. SPTB - Volatility Comparison
Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (LLDR) has a higher volatility of 2.37% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB) at 1.04%. This indicates that LLDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLDR | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.37% | 1.04% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 2.66% | +3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.26% | 3.55% | +4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.99% | 4.37% | +5.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.99% | 4.37% | +5.62% |
LLDR vs. SPTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLDR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LLDR vs. SPTB - Dividend Comparison
LLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than SPTB's 4.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LLDR Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | 4.69% | 4.42% | 1.20% |
SPTB State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF | 4.20% | 4.23% | 2.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, LLDR and SPTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LLDR has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to SPTB (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLDR dropped -12.46% vs SPTB's -4.96%.
On 1-year performance, LLDR leads with 3.36% vs 3.04% for SPTB. On fees, SPTB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTB has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LLDR has performed better with a 3.36% return vs 3.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for LLDR.
LLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 4.20% for SPTB.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LLDR and 0.03% for SPTB.
SPTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LLDR and SPTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer