PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKSCX vs. NCLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKSCX vs. NCLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund (LKSCX) and Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKSCX achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly higher than NCLEX's -6.20% return. Over the past 10 years, LKSCX has outperformed NCLEX with an annualized return of 11.78%, while NCLEX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.27% annualized return.


LKSCX

1D
0.60%
1M
2.08%
YTD
7.59%
6M
9.15%
1Y
23.99%
3Y*
16.90%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
11.78%

NCLEX

1D
-0.63%
1M
1.63%
YTD
-6.20%
6M
-7.32%
1Y
-11.96%
3Y*
0.87%
5Y*
-0.95%
10Y*
7.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKSCX vs. NCLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKSCX
LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund
7.59%13.22%15.35%22.57%-22.14%14.54%34.70%22.68%-5.67%17.08%
NCLEX
Nicholas Limited Edition Fund
-6.20%-10.41%11.91%17.17%-23.71%19.07%22.67%27.36%-0.94%19.93%

Correlation

The correlation between LKSCX and NCLEX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 1994

0.90

The correlation between LKSCX and NCLEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKSCX vs. NCLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKSCX
LKSCX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
LKSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LKSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NCLEX
NCLEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NCLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NCLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKSCX vs. NCLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund (LKSCX) and Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LKSCXNCLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.91

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

-0.51

+3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

-1.06

+10.33

LKSCX vs. NCLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the NCLEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKSCX and NCLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LKSCXNCLEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

-0.64

+2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

-0.05

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.38

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.51

-0.02

Drawdowns

LKSCX vs. NCLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKSCX drawdown since its inception was -59.07%, which is greater than NCLEX's maximum drawdown of -48.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKSCX and NCLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKSCXNCLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.07%

-48.68%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-21.36%

+11.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.21%

-28.50%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.84%

-28.50%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.65%

-35.79%

-7.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-21.53%

+20.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.39%

-8.28%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

10.19%

-7.45%

Volatility

LKSCX vs. NCLEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund (LKSCX) is 3.37%, while Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that LKSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NCLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKSCXNCLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

5.11%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.83%

12.12%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

16.90%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

19.52%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

19.21%

+3.90%

LKSCX vs. NCLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKSCX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than NCLEX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKSCX vs. NCLEX - Dividend Comparison

LKSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, more than NCLEX's 8.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LKSCX
LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund
8.35%8.98%7.27%2.77%2.43%15.70%3.86%5.24%20.61%19.58%15.37%14.66%
NCLEX
Nicholas Limited Edition Fund
8.03%7.53%2.51%2.43%6.22%16.44%5.10%5.66%10.72%7.97%10.68%8.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKSCX and NCLEX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NCLEX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to LKSCX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKSCX dropped -59.07% vs NCLEX's -48.68%.

LKSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKSCX and NCLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer