PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKEQX vs. FSSKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKEQX vs. FSSKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKCM Equity Fund (LKEQX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K (FSSKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKEQX achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than FSSKX's 15.87% return. Over the past 10 years, LKEQX has underperformed FSSKX with an annualized return of 11.92%, while FSSKX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.45% annualized return.


LKEQX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.71%
YTD
6.14%
6M
5.52%
1Y
17.87%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
11.92%

FSSKX

1D
0.34%
1M
5.90%
YTD
15.87%
6M
16.43%
1Y
37.51%
3Y*
22.95%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*
15.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKEQX vs. FSSKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKEQX
LKCM Equity Fund
6.14%10.39%14.37%12.65%-15.50%22.50%22.79%29.85%-3.30%21.69%
FSSKX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K
15.87%18.98%19.89%27.04%-19.47%23.28%25.01%32.33%-8.52%24.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LKEQX and FSSKX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2008

0.96

The correlation between LKEQX and FSSKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (1 year) to 0.96 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKEQX vs. FSSKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKEQX
LKEQX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
LKEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
LKEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FSSKX
FSSKX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FSSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FSSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKEQX vs. FSSKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM Equity Fund (LKEQX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K (FSSKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LKEQXFSSKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

2.97

-1.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

3.97

-1.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.54

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

4.20

-2.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.16

20.28

-12.12

LKEQX vs. FSSKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKEQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the FSSKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKEQX and FSSKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LKEQXFSSKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

2.97

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.75

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.83

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.55

-0.03

Drawdowns

LKEQX vs. FSSKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKEQX drawdown since its inception was -48.52%, smaller than the maximum FSSKX drawdown of -53.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKEQX and FSSKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKEQXFSSKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.52%

-53.43%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-9.20%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.59%

-20.84%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.63%

-25.20%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.15%

-34.37%

+4.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

0.00%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-7.71%

+0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.90%

+0.42%

Volatility

LKEQX vs. FSSKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LKCM Equity Fund (LKEQX) is 2.92%, while Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K (FSSKX) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that LKEQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSSKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKEQXFSSKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

3.37%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

10.00%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

13.01%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

17.79%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.75%

18.59%

-1.84%

LKEQX vs. FSSKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKEQX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FSSKX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKEQX vs. FSSKX - Dividend Comparison

LKEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than FSSKX's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSSKX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K
4.12%4.78%4.87%2.11%0.38%1.44%5.29%6.17%4.37%3.07%1.12%5.23%
LKEQX
LKCM Equity Fund
7.81%8.28%6.82%1.46%5.50%6.83%5.60%4.44%7.75%4.87%6.61%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKEQX and FSSKX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSSKX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to LKEQX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKEQX dropped -48.52% vs FSSKX's -53.43%.

FSSKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKEQX and FSSKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer