LJAN vs. USFR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LJAN (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LJAN is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. LJAN is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. Over the past year, LJAN returned 5.89% vs 3.97% for USFR. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. LJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.

Performance

LJAN vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January (LJAN) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LJAN achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.78% return.

LJAN

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 2.76%
• 1Y: 5.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USFR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: 1.89%
• 1Y: 3.97%
• 3Y*: 4.72%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: 2.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LJAN vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LJAN Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January	2.70%	5.34%	6.00%
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund	1.78%	4.23%	5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LJAN and USFR is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2024	-0.01

Return for Risk

LJAN vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LJAN

LJAN Risk / Return Rank: 82
LJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
LJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
LJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
LJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 89

USFR

USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LJAN vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January (LJAN) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LJAN	USFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	14.65	-12.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	49.88	-46.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	13.24	-11.70
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	200.29	-197.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.39	775.73	-756.34

LJAN vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 14.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LJAN and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LJAN vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LJAN drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LJAN and USFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LJAN	USFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-1.36%	-3.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.83%	-0.02%	-1.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.18%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	0.00%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-0.15%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	0.01%	+0.29%

Volatility

LJAN vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January (LJAN) has a higher volatility of 0.51% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.08%. This indicates that LJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LJAN	USFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.51%	0.08%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.31%	0.19%	+2.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51%	0.27%	+2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.97%	0.40%	+3.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.97%	0.78%	+3.19%

LJAN vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

LJAN vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

LJAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than USFR's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
LJAN Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January	4.97%	5.08%	5.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund	3.91%	4.15%	5.17%	5.12%	1.78%	0.01%	0.40%	2.08%	1.67%	1.03%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LJAN and USFR in my portfolio?

LJAN and USFR have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LJAN or USFR?

LJAN has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to USFR (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LJAN dropped -4.83% vs USFR's -1.36%.

Which ETF is better, LJAN or USFR?

On 1-year performance, LJAN leads with 5.89% vs 3.97% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LJAN or USFR?

Over the 1-year period, LJAN has performed better with a 5.89% return vs 3.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LJAN or USFR?

USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LJAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LJAN or USFR?

LJAN has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 3.91% for USFR.

What is the main difference between LJAN and USFR?

LJAN is categorized as Options Trading, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for LJAN and 0.15% for USFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.