LJAN vs. LOUP
LJAN (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LJAN is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. LJAN is actively managed, while LOUP is passively managed. Over the past year, LJAN returned 5.76% vs 63.44% for LOUP. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.
Performance
LJAN vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LJAN achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 21.20% return.
LJAN
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 5.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOUP
- 1D
- -6.15%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 21.20%
- 6M
- 18.52%
- 1Y
- 63.44%
- 3Y*
- 34.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
LJAN vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LJAN Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January | 2.39% | 5.34% | 5.92% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 21.20% | 43.24% | 25.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between LJAN and LOUP is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024 | 0.56 |
The correlation between LJAN and LOUP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LJAN vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank
LJAN
LOUP
LJAN vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January (LJAN) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LJAN | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.35 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 3.04 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.06 | 10.25 | +8.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LJAN | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.18 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.42 | 0.56 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
LJAN vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LJAN drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LJAN and LOUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LJAN | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -58.68% | +53.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.83% | -21.00% | +19.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -7.24% | +6.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -20.03% | +19.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 6.21% | -5.91% |
Volatility
LJAN vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January (LJAN) is 0.38%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 10.21%. This indicates that LJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LJAN | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 10.21% | -9.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.30% | 22.90% | -20.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52% | 29.20% | -26.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 32.49% | -28.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 32.03% | -28.04% |
LJAN vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
LJAN vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison
LJAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, while LOUP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LJAN Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January | 4.98% | 5.08% | 5.59% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LJAN and LOUP have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOUP has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to LJAN (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LJAN dropped -4.83% vs LOUP's -58.68%.
On 1-year performance, LOUP leads with 63.44% vs 5.76% for LJAN. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, LJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 63.44% return vs 5.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LJAN.
LJAN has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 0.00% for LOUP.
LJAN is categorized as Options Trading, while LOUP is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for LJAN and 0.70% for LOUP.
LJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LJAN and LOUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer