LIWKX vs. FQLSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LIWKX (BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund Class K) and FQLSX (Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, LIWKX returned 10.73%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for FQLSX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LIWKX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQLSX.

Performance

LIWKX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund Class K (LIWKX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIWKX achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly lower than FQLSX's 14.07% return.

LIWKX

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 5.71%
• YTD: 13.22%
• 6M: 14.12%
• 1Y: 30.25%
• 3Y*: 20.25%
• 5Y*: 10.73%
• 10Y*: —

FQLSX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: 14.07%
• 6M: 15.67%
• 1Y: 31.25%
• 3Y*: 22.00%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIWKX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LIWKX BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund Class K	13.22%	21.71%	14.22%	21.64%	-18.33%	18.87%	15.47%	5.73%
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund	14.07%	22.80%	18.08%	21.04%	-18.58%	16.89%	18.43%	6.04%

Correlation

The correlation between LIWKX and FQLSX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019	0.98

The correlation between LIWKX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LIWKX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIWKX

LIWKX Risk / Return Rank: 68
LIWKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
LIWKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
LIWKX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
LIWKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
LIWKX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

FQLSX

FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIWKX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund Class K (LIWKX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIWKX	FQLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	2.54	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	3.50	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.47	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	3.36	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.31	14.85	-0.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIWKX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIWKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIWKX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIWKX	FQLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	2.54	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.75	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.78	-0.07

Drawdowns

LIWKX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIWKX drawdown since its inception was -33.02%, which is greater than FQLSX's maximum drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIWKX and FQLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIWKX	FQLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.02%	-31.26%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.54%	-9.48%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.14%	-15.37%	-1.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.41%	-27.41%	+1.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.78%	-5.43%	-0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	2.14%	0.00%

Volatility

LIWKX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund Class K (LIWKX) is 3.88%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that LIWKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIWKX	FQLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	4.13%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.15%	10.29%	-0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.65%	12.54%	+0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.91%	15.12%	+0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.63%	16.08%	+2.55%

LIWKX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIWKX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LIWKX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

LIWKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than FQLSX's 4.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund	4.59%	3.32%	7.20%	2.08%	5.79%	8.05%	5.76%	7.02%	8.18%	3.10%
LIWKX BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund Class K	1.60%	1.81%	0.00%	2.02%	1.80%	1.81%	1.32%	0.88%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIWKX and FQLSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, LIWKX and FQLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LIWKX or FQLSX?

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to LIWKX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIWKX dropped -33.02% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.