PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LITE vs. RNWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LITE vs. RNWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LITE achieves a 150.02% return, which is significantly higher than RNWZ's 15.40% return.


LITE

1D
3.59%
1M
-5.06%
YTD
150.02%
6M
184.13%
1Y
1,017.52%
3Y*
158.28%
5Y*
62.72%
10Y*
43.74%

RNWZ

1D
0.06%
1M
0.92%
YTD
15.40%
6M
17.62%
1Y
34.43%
3Y*
11.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LITE vs. RNWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
150.02%339.06%60.15%0.48%-6.35%
RNWZ
TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF
15.40%36.33%-7.36%-3.89%-0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between LITE and RNWZ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2022

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LITE vs. RNWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LITE
LITE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
LITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
LITE Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
LITE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

RNWZ
RNWZ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
RNWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
RNWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LITE vs. RNWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LITERNWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+9.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.39

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

34.43

4.81

+29.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

126.26

12.90

+113.36

LITE vs. RNWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LITE Sharpe Ratio is 11.43, which is higher than the RNWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITE and RNWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LITE vs. RNWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITE drawdown since its inception was -66.89%, which is greater than RNWZ's maximum drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITE and RNWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LITERNWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.89%

-24.90%

-41.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.70%

-7.07%

-21.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.63%

-24.74%

-25.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.49%

-5.19%

-7.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.57%

-7.17%

-16.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.81%

2.63%

+5.18%

Volatility

LITE vs. RNWZ - Volatility Comparison

Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) has a higher volatility of 28.12% compared to TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) at 5.01%. This indicates that LITE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LITERNWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.12%

5.01%

+23.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.73%

12.10%

+57.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.47%

15.25%

+71.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.94%

16.98%

+42.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.62%

16.98%

+39.64%

Dividends

LITE vs. RNWZ - Dividend Comparison

LITE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RNWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RNWZ
TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF
1.94%2.12%2.36%3.87%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


LITE and RNWZ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LITE has higher volatility (28.12%) compared to RNWZ (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITE dropped -66.89% vs RNWZ's -24.90%.

LITE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.43 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LITE and RNWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer