LITB vs. ONDS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

LITB (LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd.) and ONDS (Ondas Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. LITB operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while ONDS operates in Communication Equipment (Technology). Over the past 5 years, LITB returned -16.42%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for ONDS. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

LITB vs. ONDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd. (LITB) and Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LITB achieves a 46.43% return, which is significantly higher than ONDS's -14.24% return.

LITB

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: 8.79%
• 6M: 29.64%
• YTD: 46.43%
• 1Y: 166.67%
• 3Y*: -24.50%
• 5Y*: -16.42%
• 10Y*: -16.35%
• ALL TIME*: -20.49%

ONDS

• 1D: 11.75%
• 1M: 12.96%
• 6M: -21.33%
• YTD: -14.24%
• 1Y: 280.45%
• 3Y*: 78.57%
• 5Y*: 1.42%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -5.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LITB LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd.	$10.97K	$13.58K	$26.98K
ONDS Ondas Holdings Inc.	$780.71M	$776.20M	$777.67M

LITB vs. ONDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LITB LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd.	46.43%	33.33%	-73.83%	-13.01%	21.78%	-60.24%	141.90%	-13.93%	29.79%
ONDS Ondas Holdings Inc.	-14.24%	281.25%	67.32%	-3.77%	-76.30%	-28.08%	-48.17%	0.00%	33.33%

Correlation

The correlation between LITB and ONDS is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2018	0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap LITB : $28.42M ONDS : $4.77B
EPS LITB : $1.03 ONDS : $1.52
PE Ratio LITB : 3.19 ONDS : 5.52
PS Ratio LITB : 0.13 ONDS : 13.91
Total Revenue (TTM) LITB : $229.70M ONDS : $96.60M
Gross Profit (TTM) LITB : $149.30M ONDS : $43.33M
EBITDA (TTM) LITB : $9.93M ONDS : -$75.39M

Return for Risk

LITB vs. ONDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LITB

LITB Risk / Return Rank: 86
LITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
LITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
LITB Omega Ratio Rank: 84
LITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
LITB Martin Ratio Rank: 81

ONDS

ONDS Risk / Return Rank: 91
ONDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ONDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ONDS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
ONDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ONDS Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LITB vs. ONDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd. (LITB) and Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LITB	ONDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.24	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.90	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.32	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	5.29	-2.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.70	9.79	-4.09

LITB vs. ONDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LITB Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the ONDS Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITB and ONDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LITB vs. ONDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITB drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, roughly equal to the maximum ONDS drawdown of -98.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITB and ONDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LITB	ONDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.26%	-98.28%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.64%	-53.43%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-88.21%	-77.14%	-11.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.62%	-96.99%	+6.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.54%	-57.08%	-40.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.24%	-71.17%	-17.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.35%	28.81%	+0.54%

Volatility

LITB vs. ONDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd. (LITB) is 19.30%, while Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS) has a volatility of 29.57%. This indicates that LITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LITB	ONDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.30%	29.57%	-10.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.18%	72.84%	-21.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	91.53%	126.53%	-35.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.26%	114.54%	-22.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	87.02%	120.16%	-33.14%

Dividends

LITB vs. ONDS - Dividend Comparison

Neither LITB nor ONDS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LITB and ONDS in my portfolio?

LITB and ONDS have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LITB or ONDS?

ONDS has higher volatility (29.57%) compared to LITB (19.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITB dropped -99.26% vs ONDS's -98.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.