LITB vs. ONDS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd. (LITB) and Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS).

Performance

LITB vs. ONDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd. (LITB) and Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LITB vs. ONDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LITB LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd.	2.68%	33.33%	-73.83%	-13.01%	21.78%	-60.24%	141.90%	-13.93%	29.79%
ONDS Ondas Holdings Inc.	-7.38%	281.25%	67.32%	-3.77%	-76.30%	-28.08%	-48.17%	0.00%	33.33%

Fundamentals

EPS LITB : $0.91 ONDS : -$0.97
PS Ratio LITB : 0.09 ONDS : 24.39
Total Revenue (TTM) LITB : $224.66M ONDS : $50.73M
Gross Profit (TTM) LITB : $146.10M ONDS : $20.16M
EBITDA (TTM) LITB : $9.66M ONDS : -$21.57M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LITB achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than ONDS's -7.38% return.

LITB

• 1D: 2.68%
• 1M: -12.88%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 6M: 9.52%
• 1Y: 15.00%
• 3Y*: -38.02%
• 5Y*: -32.96%
• 10Y*: -16.79%

ONDS

• 1D: 10.92%
• 1M: -10.32%
• YTD: -7.38%
• 6M: 17.10%
• 1Y: 744.86%
• 3Y*: 103.04%
• 5Y*: -0.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LITB vs. ONDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LITB

LITB Risk / Return Rank: 56
LITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
LITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
LITB Omega Ratio Rank: 51
LITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
LITB Martin Ratio Rank: 59

ONDS

ONDS Risk / Return Rank: 98
ONDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
ONDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ONDS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ONDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ONDS Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LITB vs. ONDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd. (LITB) and Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LITB	ONDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	5.78	-5.62
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	3.96	-2.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.45	-0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	13.25	-12.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.77	31.53	-29.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LITB vs. ONDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LITB Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the ONDS Sharpe Ratio of 5.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITB and ONDS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LITB	ONDS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	5.78	-5.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.36	-0.01	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.28	-0.05	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between LITB and ONDS is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LITB vs. ONDS - Dividend Comparison

Neither LITB nor ONDS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LITB vs. ONDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITB drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, roughly equal to the maximum ONDS drawdown of -98.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITB and ONDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LITB	ONDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.26%	-98.28%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.64%	-53.37%	-2.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.88%	-96.99%	+2.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.27%	-53.64%	-44.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.01%	-72.25%	-15.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.58%	22.43%	+14.15%

Volatility

LITB vs. ONDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd. (LITB) is 16.74%, while Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS) has a volatility of 25.67%. This indicates that LITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LITB	ONDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.74%	25.67%	-8.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.78%	91.80%	-29.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	103.60%	130.18%	-26.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.81%	113.48%	-21.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	86.41%	121.04%	-34.63%

Financials