PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LISDX vs. LHYAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LISDX vs. LHYAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX) and Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LISDX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than LHYAX's 1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, LISDX has underperformed LHYAX with an annualized return of 1.59%, while LHYAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.59% annualized return.


LISDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.90%
6M
1.22%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
3.58%
5Y*
1.38%
10Y*
1.59%

LHYAX

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.70%
6M
2.32%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
7.66%
5Y*
2.29%
10Y*
4.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LISDX vs. LHYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LISDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund
0.90%4.44%3.11%3.14%-4.38%0.55%2.18%4.43%1.30%1.91%
LHYAX
Lord Abbett High Yield Fund
1.70%7.44%7.25%9.84%-14.97%6.16%4.56%15.11%-5.10%8.53%

Correlation

The correlation between LISDX and LHYAX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2008

0.23

Over the past year, LISDX and LHYAX have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LISDX vs. LHYAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LISDX
LISDX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LISDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LISDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LISDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LISDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LISDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

LHYAX
LHYAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
LHYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
LHYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LISDX vs. LHYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX) and Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LISDXLHYAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.88

1.51

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.59

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.67

11.68

-3.02

LISDX vs. LHYAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LISDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the LHYAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LISDX and LHYAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LISDXLHYAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

2.15

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.45

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.80

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

1.15

+0.11

Drawdowns

LISDX vs. LHYAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LISDX drawdown since its inception was -6.72%, smaller than the maximum LHYAX drawdown of -31.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LISDX and LHYAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LISDXLHYAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-31.68%

+24.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-3.02%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.72%

-4.87%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.72%

-18.67%

+11.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.72%

-24.23%

+17.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.16%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.81%

-3.07%

+2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

0.67%

-0.23%

Volatility

LISDX vs. LHYAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX) is 0.50%, while Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) has a volatility of 1.05%. This indicates that LISDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LHYAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LISDXLHYAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.50%

1.05%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.07%

2.78%

-1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38%

3.64%

-2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.64%

5.09%

-3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.76%

5.73%

-3.97%

LISDX vs. LHYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LISDX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than LHYAX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

LISDX vs. LHYAX - Dividend Comparison

LISDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than LHYAX's 7.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LHYAX
Lord Abbett High Yield Fund
7.21%7.13%6.02%5.84%4.60%4.91%5.15%5.47%6.29%5.65%5.85%6.08%
LISDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund
2.99%3.53%3.06%2.34%1.12%1.05%1.58%2.15%1.74%1.31%1.29%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


LISDX and LHYAX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LHYAX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to LISDX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LISDX dropped -6.72% vs LHYAX's -31.68%.

LISDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LISDX and LHYAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer