LISDX vs. DMREX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LISDX (Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund) and DMREX (DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, LISDX returned 1.59%/yr vs 2.88%/yr for DMREX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LISDX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for DMREX.

Performance

LISDX vs. DMREX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX) and DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DMREX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LISDX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than DMREX's 2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, LISDX has underperformed DMREX with an annualized return of 1.59%, while DMREX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.88% annualized return.

LISDX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 3.79%
• 3Y*: 3.58%
• 5Y*: 1.39%
• 10Y*: 1.59%

DMREX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 2.23%
• 6M: 2.29%
• 1Y: 3.60%
• 3Y*: 3.40%
• 5Y*: 2.55%
• 10Y*: 2.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LISDX vs. DMREX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LISDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund	0.90%	4.44%	3.11%	3.14%	-4.38%	0.55%	2.18%	4.43%	1.30%	1.91%
DMREX DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio	2.23%	2.77%	3.10%	2.56%	-1.42%	6.75%	4.11%	6.64%	-0.51%	2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between LISDX and DMREX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between LISDX and DMREX has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LISDX vs. DMREX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LISDX

LISDX Risk / Return Rank: 73
LISDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
LISDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
LISDX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
LISDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
LISDX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

DMREX

DMREX Risk / Return Rank: 95
DMREX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
DMREX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
DMREX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
DMREX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
DMREX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LISDX vs. DMREX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX) and DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DMREX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LISDX	DMREX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	3.67	-0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.86	6.28	-1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.88	2.12	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	7.10	-4.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.68	16.54	-7.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LISDX vs. DMREX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LISDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the DMREX Sharpe Ratio of 3.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LISDX and DMREX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LISDX	DMREX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.76	3.67	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	1.04	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	0.92	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	0.88	+0.38

Drawdowns

LISDX vs. DMREX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LISDX drawdown since its inception was -6.72%, smaller than the maximum DMREX drawdown of -13.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LISDX and DMREX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LISDX	DMREX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.72%	-13.22%	+6.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.44%	-0.51%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.72%	-2.48%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.72%	-5.33%	-1.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-6.72%	-13.22%	+6.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	0.00%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.81%	-0.88%	+0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.44%	0.22%	+0.22%

Volatility

LISDX vs. DMREX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX) has a higher volatility of 0.50% compared to DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DMREX) at 0.39%. This indicates that LISDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMREX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LISDX	DMREX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.50%	0.39%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.08%	0.79%	+0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38%	0.99%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.64%	2.45%	-0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.76%	3.14%	-1.38%

LISDX vs. DMREX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LISDX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DMREX's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

LISDX vs. DMREX - Dividend Comparison

LISDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than DMREX's 3.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DMREX DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio	3.24%	2.95%	3.55%	1.96%	1.16%	0.98%	1.44%	2.26%	1.54%	1.32%	1.15%	1.09%
LISDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund	2.99%	3.53%	3.06%	2.34%	1.12%	1.05%	1.58%	2.15%	1.74%	1.31%	1.29%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LISDX and DMREX in my portfolio?

LISDX and DMREX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LISDX or DMREX?

LISDX has higher volatility (0.50%) compared to DMREX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LISDX dropped -6.72% vs DMREX's -13.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMREX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.