PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIPIX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIPIX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Institutional (LIPIX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIPIX achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 12.17% return. Over the past 10 years, LIPIX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 11.50%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.08% annualized return.


LIPIX

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.35%
6M
7.09%
YTD
10.78%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
11.50%
ALL TIME*
9.96%

NASDX

1D
0.59%
1M
-3.62%
6M
10.09%
YTD
12.17%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
16.19%
10Y*
21.08%
ALL TIME*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LIPIX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIPIX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Institutional
10.78%20.70%15.61%21.25%-18.33%18.68%14.23%26.72%-7.86%21.38%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
12.17%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LIPIX and NASDX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2011

0.85

The correlation between LIPIX and NASDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIPIX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LIPIX
LIPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LIPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
LIPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LIPIX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Institutional (LIPIX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIPIXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.21

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

1.90

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.84

6.14

+3.71

LIPIX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIPIX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LIPIX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIPIX drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIPIX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIPIXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.29%

-83.16%

+48.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.09%

-11.90%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.98%

-22.71%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.39%

-35.33%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.29%

-35.33%

+1.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-7.59%

+6.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

-34.18%

+29.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

3.67%

-1.51%

Volatility

LIPIX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Institutional (LIPIX) is 3.65%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that LIPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIPIXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

6.80%

-3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

15.94%

-4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.07%

19.35%

-6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.63%

23.53%

-7.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

22.87%

-6.40%

LIPIX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIPIX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIPIX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

LIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than NASDX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIPIX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Institutional
2.54%2.77%2.45%2.10%2.03%2.15%1.08%3.29%2.37%2.31%1.57%3.12%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
3.21%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIPIX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NASDX has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to LIPIX (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIPIX dropped -34.29% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

LIPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIPIX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer