PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIN vs. FNMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LIN vs. FNMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Linde plc (LIN) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIN achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly higher than FNMA's -39.52% return.


LIN

1D
1.58%
1M
2.33%
YTD
23.59%
6M
26.61%
1Y
12.77%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*

FNMA

1D
2.72%
1M
-18.98%
YTD
-39.52%
6M
-39.35%
1Y
-34.25%
3Y*
145.80%
5Y*
22.01%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIN vs. FNMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LIN
Linde plc
23.59%3.22%3.18%27.66%-4.39%33.39%25.88%39.04%-5.26%
FNMA
Federal National Mortgage Association
-39.52%227.13%206.54%202.77%-56.90%-65.69%-23.40%194.34%-26.39%

Correlation

The correlation between LIN and FNMA is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.14

The correlation between LIN and FNMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LIN:

$244.15B

FNMA:

$38.25B

EPS

LIN:

$15.16

FNMA:

$2.77

PE Ratio

LIN:

34.54

FNMA:

2.34

PEG Ratio

LIN:

1.72

FNMA:

0.00

PS Ratio

LIN:

7.10

FNMA:

0.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

LIN:

$34.66B

FNMA:

$161.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LIN:

$15.94B

FNMA:

$117.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

LIN:

$12.31B

FNMA:

$111.39B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIN vs. FNMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIN
LIN Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
LIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIN Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FNMA
FNMA Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FNMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNMA Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FNMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNMA Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIN vs. FNMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Linde plc (LIN) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LINFNMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.00

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

-0.49

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

-0.91

+2.80

LIN vs. FNMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIN Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the FNMA Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIN and FNMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LIN vs. FNMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIN drawdown since its inception was -32.59%, smaller than the maximum FNMA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIN and FNMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LINFNMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.59%

-99.74%

+67.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.18%

-69.76%

+50.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-69.76%

+50.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.82%

-85.03%

+62.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-91.14%

+91.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-46.18%

+40.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.79%

37.56%

-30.77%

Volatility

LIN vs. FNMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Linde plc (LIN) is 5.57%, while Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) has a volatility of 18.31%. This indicates that LIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LINFNMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

18.31%

-12.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

66.11%

-52.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.24%

93.38%

-76.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

91.93%

-71.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.08%

81.90%

-57.82%

Dividends

LIN vs. FNMA - Dividend Comparison

LIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while FNMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FNMA
Federal National Mortgage Association
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LIN
Linde plc
1.18%1.41%1.33%1.24%1.43%1.22%1.46%1.64%0.53%

Financials

LIN vs. FNMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Linde plc and Federal National Mortgage Association. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
8.78B
40.22B
(LIN) Total Revenue
(FNMA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LIN vs. FNMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Linde plc and Federal National Mortgage Association over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
48.5%
0
Portfolio components
LIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported a gross profit of 4.26B and revenue of 8.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.

FNMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 40.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported an operating income of 3.26B and revenue of 8.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.

FNMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 40.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

LIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported a net income of 1.86B and revenue of 8.78B, resulting in a net margin of 21.2%.

FNMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported a net income of 5.61B and revenue of 40.22B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LIN and FNMA have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNMA has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to LIN (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIN dropped -32.59% vs FNMA's -99.74%.

LIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIN and FNMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer