LIGS.DE vs. ESIN.DE
LIGS.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Industrial Goods & Services UCITS ETF Acc) and ESIN.DE (iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Industrials Equities funds - LIGS.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Industrial Goods & Services while ESIN.DE tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LIGS.DE returned 10.99%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for ESIN.DE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LIGS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIN.DE.
Performance
LIGS.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIGS.DE achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than ESIN.DE's 8.75% return.
LIGS.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 13.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
ESIN.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 6M
- 11.05%
- 1Y
- 15.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- —
LIGS.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIGS.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Industrial Goods & Services UCITS ETF Acc | 7.15% | 23.89% | 14.58% | 23.36% | -18.76% | 13.64% |
ESIN.DE iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 8.75% | 25.30% | 14.45% | 26.98% | -16.86% | 13.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIGS.DE and ESIN.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2021 | 0.97 |
The correlation between LIGS.DE and ESIN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIGS.DE vs. ESIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LIGS.DE
ESIN.DE
LIGS.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Industrial Goods & Services UCITS ETF Acc (LIGS.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIGS.DE | ESIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.15 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.16 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.50 | 4.21 | -0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIGS.DE | ESIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 0.78 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.67 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.70 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
LIGS.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -60.31%, which is greater than ESIN.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIGS.DE and ESIN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIGS.DE | ESIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.31% | -29.12% | -31.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.09% | -13.11% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.40% | -18.30% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.95% | -29.12% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -2.69% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -6.30% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 3.61% | +0.09% |
Volatility
LIGS.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Industrial Goods & Services UCITS ETF Acc (LIGS.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE) have volatilities of 6.08% and 6.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIGS.DE | ESIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 6.37% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.09% | 16.51% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 19.60% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 18.85% | +0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.83% | 18.81% | +1.02% |
LIGS.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIN.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIGS.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LIGS.DE nor ESIN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, LIGS.DE and ESIN.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ESIN.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIN.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LIGS.DE.
LIGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Industrial Goods & Services, while ESIN.DE tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LIGS.DE and 0.18% for ESIN.DE.
Find the right allocation for LIGS.DE and ESIN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer