LIFE.L vs. LVNG.L
LIFE.L (Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF) and LVNG.L (Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds from Rize ETF tracking the Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LIFE.L returned 8.49%/yr vs 8.76%/yr for LVNG.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
LIFE.L vs. LVNG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LIFE.L is traded in USD, while LVNG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LVNG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIFE.L achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly lower than LVNG.L's 11.02% return.
LIFE.L
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- 6M
- 5.80%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 17.23%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- —
LVNG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- YTD
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 17.85%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LIFE.L vs. LVNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIFE.L Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF | 10.44% | 25.27% | -4.01% | 15.12% | -20.54% | 4.72% |
LVNG.L Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF | 11.02% | 25.66% | -3.94% | 14.46% | -20.64% | 4.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIFE.L and LVNG.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between LIFE.L and LVNG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIFE.L vs. LVNG.L — Risk / Return Rank
LIFE.L
LVNG.L
LIFE.L vs. LVNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (LIFE.L) and Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (LVNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIFE.L | LVNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.21 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.84 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.93 | 5.32 | -0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIFE.L vs. LVNG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIFE.L drawdown since its inception was -34.57%, roughly equal to the maximum LVNG.L drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFE.L and LVNG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIFE.L | LVNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.57% | -34.72% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.58% | -10.43% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.00% | -22.13% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.32% | -5.76% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.67% | -12.75% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 3.61% | +0.10% |
Volatility
LIFE.L vs. LVNG.L - Volatility Comparison
Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (LIFE.L) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (LVNG.L) at 4.62%. This indicates that LIFE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIFE.L | LVNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 4.62% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.24% | 13.05% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.34% | 16.40% | +0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 18.99% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 18.99% | +0.46% |
LIFE.L vs. LVNG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LIFE.L and LVNG.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
LIFE.L vs. LVNG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LIFE.L nor LVNG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LIFE.L and LVNG.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LIFE.L and LVNG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
Both ETFs track Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF.
Find the right allocation for LIFE.L and LVNG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer