LIFE.L vs. LGUS.L
LIFE.L (Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF) and LGUS.L (L&G US Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - LIFE.L tracks the Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF while LGUS.L tracks the L&G US Equity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LIFE.L returned 5.24%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for LGUS.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LIFE.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for LGUS.L.
Performance
LIFE.L vs. LGUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LIFE.L having a 10.44% return and LGUS.L slightly lower at 10.34%.
LIFE.L
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- 6M
- 5.80%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 17.23%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- —
LGUS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 21.64%
- 3Y*
- 20.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
LIFE.L vs. LGUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIFE.L Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF | 10.44% | 25.27% | -4.01% | 15.12% | -20.54% | 4.83% |
LGUS.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF | 10.34% | 17.98% | 25.09% | 28.66% | -20.46% | 8.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIFE.L and LGUS.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between LIFE.L and LGUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIFE.L vs. LGUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
LIFE.L
LGUS.L
LIFE.L vs. LGUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (LIFE.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIFE.L | LGUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.59 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.93 | 9.99 | -5.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIFE.L vs. LGUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIFE.L drawdown since its inception was -34.57%, roughly equal to the maximum LGUS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFE.L and LGUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIFE.L | LGUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.57% | -34.26% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.58% | -8.58% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.00% | -19.46% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.57% | -25.64% | -8.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.32% | -0.49% | -5.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.67% | -5.30% | -7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 2.23% | +1.48% |
Volatility
LIFE.L vs. LGUS.L - Volatility Comparison
Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (LIFE.L) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L) at 2.86%. This indicates that LIFE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIFE.L | LGUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 2.86% | +2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.24% | 9.41% | +4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.34% | 12.47% | +4.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 16.51% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 18.10% | +1.35% |
LIFE.L vs. LGUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIFE.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUS.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIFE.L vs. LGUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LIFE.L nor LGUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LIFE.L and LGUS.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for LIFE.L.
LIFE.L tracks Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF, while LGUS.L tracks L&G US Equity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Rize ETF and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for LIFE.L and 0.05% for LGUS.L.
Find the right allocation for LIFE.L and LGUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer