LIFAX vs. FFNYX
LIFAX (Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A) and FFNYX (Fidelity SAI 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. LIFAX is actively managed, while FFNYX is passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LIFAX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FFNYX.
Performance
LIFAX vs. FFNYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LIFAX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 5.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.99%
- 10Y*
- 3.79%
FFNYX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LIFAX vs. FFNYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LIFAX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A | 1.41% |
FFNYX Fidelity SAI 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIFAX and FFNYX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIFAX vs. FFNYX — Risk / Return Rank
LIFAX
FFNYX
LIFAX vs. FFNYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX) and Fidelity SAI 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FFNYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIFAX | FFNYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.03 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIFAX | FFNYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 2.34 | -1.88 |
Drawdowns
LIFAX vs. FFNYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIFAX drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, which is greater than FFNYX's maximum drawdown of -0.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFAX and FFNYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIFAX | FFNYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -0.69% | -17.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.10% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -0.18% | -3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | — | — |
Volatility
LIFAX vs. FFNYX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIFAX | FFNYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27% | 1.87% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 1.87% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.54% | 1.87% | +2.67% |
LIFAX vs. FFNYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIFAX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FFNYX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIFAX vs. FFNYX - Dividend Comparison
LIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than FFNYX's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFNYX Fidelity SAI 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LIFAX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A | 4.72% | 4.74% | 4.00% | 3.69% | 2.60% | 2.35% | 3.59% | 3.95% | 3.95% | 3.76% | 4.32% | 4.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIFAX and FFNYX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LIFAX and FFNYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer