PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIFAX vs. APOIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIFAX vs. APOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX) and American Century Short Duration Inflation Protection Bond Fund Investor Class (APOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LIFAX having a 1.95% return and APOIX slightly higher at 2.02%. Over the past 10 years, LIFAX has outperformed APOIX with an annualized return of 3.80%, while APOIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.13% annualized return.


LIFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.11%
YTD
1.95%
6M
1.98%
1Y
5.45%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*
3.80%

APOIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
2.02%
6M
1.90%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
2.96%
10Y*
3.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIFAX vs. APOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIFAX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A
1.95%7.03%4.53%3.76%-5.57%10.29%5.94%4.87%-1.27%1.34%
APOIX
American Century Short Duration Inflation Protection Bond Fund Investor Class
2.02%5.95%4.15%3.82%-3.89%6.30%5.06%4.77%1.81%0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between LIFAX and APOIX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2011

0.54

Over the past year, LIFAX and APOIX have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIFAX vs. APOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIFAX
LIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
LIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
LIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

APOIX
APOIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
APOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
APOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
APOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
APOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIFAX vs. APOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX) and American Century Short Duration Inflation Protection Bond Fund Investor Class (APOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LIFAXAPOIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.51

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.55

5.81

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.03

19.09

-0.06

LIFAX vs. APOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the APOIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIFAX and APOIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIFAXAPOIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.45

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.90

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

1.10

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.72

-0.25

Drawdowns

LIFAX vs. APOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIFAX drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, which is greater than APOIX's maximum drawdown of -14.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFAX and APOIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIFAXAPOIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.15%

-14.54%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.18%

-0.76%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.03%

-1.42%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.56%

-6.58%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.05%

-6.58%

-11.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-1.99%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.23%

+0.05%

Volatility

LIFAX vs. APOIX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX) has a higher volatility of 0.66% compared to American Century Short Duration Inflation Protection Bond Fund Investor Class (APOIX) at 0.51%. This indicates that LIFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIFAXAPOIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

0.51%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.62%

1.25%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27%

1.81%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.00%

3.31%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.54%

2.85%

+1.69%

LIFAX vs. APOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIFAX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APOIX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIFAX vs. APOIX - Dividend Comparison

LIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than APOIX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APOIX
American Century Short Duration Inflation Protection Bond Fund Investor Class
3.91%3.99%2.31%2.78%5.63%3.92%0.81%1.69%3.99%1.52%0.42%0.00%
LIFAX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A
4.71%4.74%4.00%3.69%2.60%2.35%3.59%3.95%3.95%3.76%4.32%4.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIFAX and APOIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIFAX has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to APOIX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIFAX dropped -18.15% vs APOIX's -14.54%.

APOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIFAX and APOIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer