PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LICYX vs. LIAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LICYX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LICYX achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 16.95% return.


LICYX

1D
3.95%
1M
-2.57%
6M
6.66%
YTD
14.34%
1Y
27.33%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
9.44%
ALL TIME*
6.61%

LIAGX

1D
4.37%
1M
-6.12%
6M
8.48%
YTD
16.95%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LICYX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LICYX
Lord Abbett International Equity Fund
14.34%31.78%9.57%12.57%-18.62%2.19%
LIAGX
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund
16.95%25.09%9.43%15.73%-26.63%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LICYX and LIAGX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021

0.96

The correlation between LICYX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LICYX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LICYX
LICYX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
LICYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LICYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
LICYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
LICYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
LICYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

LIAGX
LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LICYX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LICYXLIAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.20

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.60

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.64

5.36

+1.28

LICYX vs. LIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LICYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the LIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LICYX and LIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LICYX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LICYX drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, which is greater than LIAGX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LICYX and LIAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LICYXLIAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.02%

-37.87%

-21.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.35%

-16.02%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-17.11%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.99%

-37.87%

+6.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.85%

-12.35%

+5.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.82%

-13.02%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

4.76%

-0.90%

Volatility

LICYX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) is 7.60%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that LICYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LICYXLIAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.60%

9.28%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.81%

22.99%

-4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.86%

25.26%

-4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

19.80%

-2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

19.68%

-2.46%

LICYX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LICYX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

LICYX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

LICYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than LIAGX's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIAGX
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund
0.32%0.38%0.48%0.71%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LICYX
Lord Abbett International Equity Fund
4.62%5.28%4.52%1.98%2.28%12.73%1.33%1.68%2.47%2.17%2.52%1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, LICYX and LIAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LIAGX has higher volatility (9.28%) compared to LICYX (7.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LICYX dropped -59.02% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.

LICYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LICYX and LIAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer