PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LICYX vs. LALDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LICYX vs. LALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LICYX achieves a 22.75% return, which is significantly higher than LALDX's 0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, LICYX has outperformed LALDX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while LALDX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.39% annualized return.


LICYX

1D
0.49%
1M
6.74%
YTD
22.75%
6M
22.61%
1Y
37.73%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
11.17%

LALDX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.84%
1Y
3.69%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
1.92%
10Y*
2.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LICYX vs. LALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LICYX
Lord Abbett International Equity Fund
22.75%31.78%9.57%12.57%-18.62%11.80%17.30%21.73%-17.91%25.52%
LALDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
0.44%5.70%4.48%4.76%-5.48%1.17%2.98%5.42%1.24%2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LICYX and LALDX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2003

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LICYX vs. LALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LICYX
LICYX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LICYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LICYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LICYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LICYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LICYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

LALDX
LALDX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
LALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LICYX vs. LALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LICYXLALDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.47

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.09

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.31

12.73

-1.42

LICYX vs. LALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LICYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the LALDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LICYX and LALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LICYX vs. LALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LICYX drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, which is greater than LALDX's maximum drawdown of -10.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LICYX and LALDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LICYXLALDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.02%

-10.58%

-48.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.35%

-1.29%

-12.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-1.29%

-13.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.99%

-7.60%

-23.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-9.67%

-26.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.52%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.86%

-0.82%

-12.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

0.31%

+3.09%

Volatility

LICYX vs. LALDX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX) at 0.86%. This indicates that LICYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LICYXLALDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

0.86%

+7.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.02%

1.98%

+15.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

2.49%

+16.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

2.71%

+14.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.33%

2.61%

+14.72%

LICYX vs. LALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LICYX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than LALDX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

LICYX vs. LALDX - Dividend Comparison

LICYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than LALDX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LALDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
4.97%5.01%4.11%4.09%2.42%2.37%2.88%3.59%3.88%3.71%3.95%3.95%
LICYX
Lord Abbett International Equity Fund
4.30%5.28%4.52%1.98%2.28%12.73%1.33%1.68%2.47%2.17%2.52%1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


LICYX and LALDX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LICYX has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to LALDX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LICYX dropped -59.02% vs LALDX's -10.58%.

LICYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LICYX and LALDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer