LIAGX vs. FTCNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) and FTCNX (Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, LIAGX returned 21.75%/yr vs 16.60%/yr for FTCNX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LIAGX charges 0.81%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for FTCNX.

Performance

LIAGX vs. FTCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIAGX achieves a 27.78% return, which is significantly higher than FTCNX's 7.71% return.

LIAGX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 10.09%
• YTD: 27.78%
• 6M: 28.66%
• 1Y: 41.65%
• 3Y*: 21.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTCNX

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 7.71%
• 6M: 11.49%
• 1Y: 18.04%
• 3Y*: 16.60%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: 9.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIAGX vs. FTCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	27.78%	25.09%	9.43%	15.73%	-26.63%	0.07%
FTCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M	7.71%	25.18%	8.57%	14.02%	-6.70%	4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between LIAGX and FTCNX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021	0.71

The correlation between LIAGX and FTCNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LIAGX vs. FTCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIAGX

LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 48
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FTCNX

FTCNX Risk / Return Rank: 29
FTCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FTCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
FTCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FTCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FTCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIAGX vs. FTCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIAGX	FTCNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	1.45	+0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	2.00	+0.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.26	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	2.37	+0.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.32	7.81	+3.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIAGX vs. FTCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the FTCNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIAGX and FTCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIAGX	FTCNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	1.45	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.27	+0.18

Drawdowns

LIAGX vs. FTCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIAGX drawdown since its inception was -37.87%, smaller than the maximum FTCNX drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIAGX and FTCNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIAGX	FTCNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.87%	-58.27%	+20.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.56%	-7.65%	-6.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.11%	-12.23%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.67%	+0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.24%	-12.39%	-0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	2.32%	+1.30%

Volatility

LIAGX vs. FTCNX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX) at 2.74%. This indicates that LIAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIAGX	FTCNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.29%	2.74%	+5.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.01%	9.86%	+8.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.68%	12.53%	+8.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.79%	15.96%	+2.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.79%	17.42%	+1.37%

LIAGX vs. FTCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIAGX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than FTCNX's 1.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIAGX vs. FTCNX - Dividend Comparison

LIAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than FTCNX's 4.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M	4.76%	5.13%	6.90%	2.83%	3.47%	4.58%	1.99%	3.89%	6.55%	0.90%	1.08%	0.15%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	0.30%	0.38%	0.48%	0.71%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIAGX and FTCNX in my portfolio?

LIAGX and FTCNX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIAGX or FTCNX?

LIAGX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to FTCNX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIAGX dropped -37.87% vs FTCNX's -58.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.