LIAGX vs. FAOIX
LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) and FAOIX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class I) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, LIAGX returned 21.75%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for FAOIX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LIAGX charges 0.81%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for FAOIX.
Performance
LIAGX vs. FAOIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LIAGX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 10.09%
- YTD
- 27.78%
- 6M
- 28.66%
- 1Y
- 41.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAOIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -1.66%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
LIAGX vs. FAOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 27.78% | 25.09% | 9.43% | 15.73% | -26.63% | 0.07% |
FAOIX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class I | 0.00% | 15.25% | 4.92% | 20.35% | -24.38% | 7.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIAGX and FAOIX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021 | 0.86 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LIAGX and FAOIX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIAGX vs. FAOIX — Risk / Return Rank
LIAGX
FAOIX
LIAGX vs. FAOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class I (FAOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIAGX | FAOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.95 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | -0.35 | +3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | -0.60 | +11.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIAGX | FAOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | -0.28 | +2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.32 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
LIAGX vs. FAOIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIAGX drawdown since its inception was -37.87%, smaller than the maximum FAOIX drawdown of -59.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIAGX and FAOIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIAGX | FAOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.87% | -59.86% | +21.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.56% | -7.28% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.11% | -13.98% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.85% | +5.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -14.20% | +0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 3.96% | -0.34% |
Volatility
LIAGX vs. FAOIX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class I (FAOIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that LIAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIAGX | FAOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.29% | 0.00% | +8.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.01% | 4.08% | +13.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.68% | 9.20% | +11.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 16.74% | +2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 16.70% | +2.09% |
LIAGX vs. FAOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIAGX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOIX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIAGX vs. FAOIX - Dividend Comparison
LIAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than FAOIX's 8.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOIX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class I | 8.49% | 8.49% | 1.66% | 0.96% | 0.63% | 2.06% | 0.00% | 1.35% | 5.09% | 3.79% | 1.49% | 0.63% |
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.48% | 0.71% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIAGX and FAOIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIAGX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to FAOIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIAGX dropped -37.87% vs FAOIX's -59.86%.
LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIAGX and FAOIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer