PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LHYAX vs. CRDOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LHYAX vs. CRDOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) and Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LHYAX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than CRDOX's 1.94% return.


LHYAX

1D
0.32%
1M
-1.27%
6M
0.07%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
4.13%
ALL TIME*
5.87%

CRDOX

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.61%
6M
1.19%
YTD
1.94%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
7.49%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LHYAX vs. CRDOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LHYAX
Lord Abbett High Yield Fund
0.83%7.44%7.25%9.84%-14.97%6.16%3.17%
CRDOX
Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund
1.94%7.48%8.69%8.06%-10.62%2.66%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between LHYAX and CRDOX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2020

0.75

The correlation between LHYAX and CRDOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LHYAX vs. CRDOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LHYAX
LHYAX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
LHYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
LHYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDOX
CRDOX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CRDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LHYAX vs. CRDOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) and Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LHYAXCRDOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.14

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.07

9.24

-2.16

LHYAX vs. CRDOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LHYAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the CRDOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LHYAX and CRDOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LHYAX vs. CRDOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LHYAX drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, which is greater than CRDOX's maximum drawdown of -15.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHYAX and CRDOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LHYAXCRDOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.68%

-15.92%

-15.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-2.70%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.87%

-4.66%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.67%

-15.92%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-0.83%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-3.43%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.62%

+0.09%

Volatility

LHYAX vs. CRDOX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX) at 0.58%. This indicates that LHYAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRDOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LHYAXCRDOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

0.58%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

2.33%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

2.88%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.09%

4.15%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.69%

3.98%

+1.71%

LHYAX vs. CRDOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LHYAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than CRDOX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

LHYAX vs. CRDOX - Dividend Comparison

LHYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, more than CRDOX's 6.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRDOX
Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund
6.57%5.18%6.96%6.86%5.82%2.73%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LHYAX
Lord Abbett High Yield Fund
6.68%7.13%6.02%5.84%4.60%4.91%5.15%5.47%6.29%5.65%5.85%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


LHYAX and CRDOX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LHYAX has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to CRDOX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LHYAX dropped -31.68% vs CRDOX's -15.92%.

CRDOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LHYAX and CRDOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer