LHTC.DE vs. VJPU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LHTC.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc) and VJPU.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LHTC.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Health Care, while VJPU.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan (USD Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LHTC.DE returned 2.35%/yr vs 25.97%/yr for VJPU.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LHTC.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for VJPU.L.

Performance

LHTC.DE vs. VJPU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LHTC.DE is traded in EUR, while VJPU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VJPU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LHTC.DE achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than VJPU.L's 21.00% return.

LHTC.DE

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: -2.55%
• 6M: -1.03%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: 2.35%
• 5Y*: 5.04%
• 10Y*: 5.88%

VJPU.L

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 7.61%
• YTD: 21.00%
• 6M: 22.21%
• 1Y: 50.76%
• 3Y*: 25.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LHTC.DE vs. VJPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LHTC.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc	-2.55%	7.11%	3.92%	7.59%	-3.45%
VJPU.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc	21.02%	15.92%	31.97%	31.58%	-4.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LHTC.DE and VJPU.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	0.28

Return for Risk

LHTC.DE vs. VJPU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LHTC.DE

LHTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 14
LHTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
LHTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
LHTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 13
LHTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
LHTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 13

VJPU.L

VJPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
VJPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
VJPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
VJPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
VJPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LHTC.DE vs. VJPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LHTC.DE	VJPU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	2.61	-2.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.56	3.57	-3.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.48	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	6.65	-6.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.89	22.36	-21.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LHTC.DE vs. VJPU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LHTC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LHTC.DE and VJPU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LHTC.DE	VJPU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	2.61	-2.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	1.18	-0.74

Drawdowns

LHTC.DE vs. VJPU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LHTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, which is greater than VJPU.L's maximum drawdown of -26.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHTC.DE and VJPU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LHTC.DE	VJPU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.53%	-26.23%	-14.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.43%	-7.59%	-4.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.48%	-26.23%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.60%	-0.42%	-11.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.31%	-3.64%	-5.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.67%	2.26%	+3.41%

Volatility

LHTC.DE vs. VJPU.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) at 3.52%. This indicates that LHTC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VJPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LHTC.DE	VJPU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.69%	3.52%	+2.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.67%	14.73%	-3.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.60%	19.37%	-2.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.44%	20.57%	-5.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.57%	20.57%	-5.00%

LHTC.DE vs. VJPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LHTC.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VJPU.L's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

LHTC.DE vs. VJPU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LHTC.DE nor VJPU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LHTC.DE and VJPU.L in my portfolio?

LHTC.DE and VJPU.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LHTC.DE or VJPU.L?

On fees, VJPU.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LHTC.DE or VJPU.L?

VJPU.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LHTC.DE.

What is the main difference between LHTC.DE and VJPU.L?

LHTC.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VJPU.L is Japan Equities. LHTC.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Health Care, while VJPU.L tracks FTSE Japan (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LHTC.DE and 0.20% for VJPU.L.